preferably an F1. I actually hate many English computers, being they
I know what you mean.... :-)
used a lot of ASICs earlier then us Yanks did
(seemingly. My Nimbus
motherboard has all sorts of horrid crap on it). But it's too cute to
pass up.
I didn;t think Apricot were too bad in this respect. The original Apricto
doesn't seem to cotnain any ASICs, although there are programmed
microcontrolelrs in the keyboard and in the floppy drives (the latter
being SOny units), it's the stnadard Sony-progammed microcontroller).
There isan 8089 in there, though...
I didn't think the F1 had much custom silcion in it either. I think I
have the tech mnaul for it somewhere, I can check for you.
The expanison cards for the Apricot do seem to cotnain a lot of ASICs,
particularly thigns like the colour video card.
Not all UK comptuers ar full of custom silicon. In particular :
Research Machines : 380Z, 480Z are OK, Nimbus is full of ASICs
Newbrain : A Cop 400 microcontroller is the only custom part that I
remember :
Acorn : 'System' machines and the Atom are OK., The BBC micro and B+ have
2 ULAs. Second processros have a ULA each (the 'tube ULA'). The ACW, etc,
therefore cotnain 3 ULAs -- 2 on the B+ board, one o nthe coprocesor. THe
Electron is designed round a ULA.
Torch : The Beeb corpocessors don't have Tube ULAs, and are OK as a
rsult. The XXX also has no custom parts otehr than PALs (and the boot
ROM). IIRC the quad-X has a custom control processor thing for which
there is a data sheet.
WCW. The MG1 and Hitec seem to have no ULAs.PALs, yes, ROMs, yes,
microcontrollers maybe.
Sinclair : MK14 and ZX80 are OK, everything later (including peripherals)
are full of ULAs
Jupiter Cantab : The Ace cotnains no ULAs
Amstrad : Stuffed full of the unpleasant chips!
Dragon : No ULAs that I have ever seen
And that's just the ones I can remember...
-tony