OK... sorry about the premature ejection - keyboard shortcuts and fat
fingers don't work well together.
On 7/11/05, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Sounds like the infernal DEC LK201... I've never
managed to repair one of
those either.
I haven't seen the inside of an LK201, but they do sound similar.
If it's screwed together, or if you can use screws
to reasssemble it
after cutting off the heat-stakes (the IBM PC/AT 101-key keyboard is built
this way), then take it apart, clean the contact layers with propan-2-ol.
and pray :-). Most of these keybaords are heat-staked and you can't use
screws (noting to tap into), so you are pretty much stuck.
I don't think that's a problem in the case of an SX-64. The mylar layers are
either screwed down to the face, or held in place by plastic pegs molded into
the backside *IIRC*.
I've seen the results of conductive paint, BTW - also not pretty.
How similar is the matrix to the C64 keyboard?
Given that AFAIK, that part of the ROMs are identical, I'd give it
even money that the matrices are compatible (the SX-64 _might_ have
fewer keys; can't remember). One
thought I had in the past was to turn a dead C-64 shell into an SX-64
keyboard shell - make a DB-25 to single-inline post connector cable,
then hook the C-64 keyboard harness to that - and voila - nearly
instant external keyboard. I did look at the schematics on funet, but
I didn't find any SX-64 pages with an obvious key matrix. Shouldn't
be hard to reverse-engineer one given an SX-64 in front of you, and
the C-64 and/or SX-64 schematics showing what I/O pins are attached to
the keyboard matrix.
I have not tried this, but I have every expectation of it working.
-ethan