On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 21:34 -0500, Scott Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2005 12:31:57 -0400
"Computer Collector Newsletter" <news at computercollector.com> wrote:
...Why that "ten year rule" no longer
applies: Java.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/05/05/HNjavaat10_1.html
I can already hear the moans of "hear we go again" but I figured this
example is amusing enough... I recall that last time we sort of agreed
that date alone is hardly what makes something "vintage". I still
concur.
Oh, I dunno. There's a certain folkloric amusement in collecting
examples of early Java hype. It's kinda like looking back at old issues
of Mondo 2000 magazine. Was there anything 'java' *except* hype for the
first few years?
Well, back in 1996 I was involved in a large client-server Java project
for a company that attempted to drag SSA's business planning / control
software into something resembling modern times...
Their software was all based on AS/400s with users sitting at dumb
terminals at this time; the only way for us to intelligently talk to the
back-end servers was via screen-scraping middleware.
Long story short though, we ended up with about 30k lines of client and
server Java code, plus a million or so lines of autogenerated code to
produce the screen layouts which mimiced the fields that a user of a
dumb terminal would see, with the client-side code all running in a
browser.
It was probably one of the first serious attempts anywhere at server-
side Java, as well as one of the biggest Java apps around, and certainly
proved that the technology worked. (I remember we got early access to
Sun's attempts at a Java NC, and they were bloody awful bits of
equipment)
SSA's big clients were using all sorts of hardware alongside the big
AS/400 systems and terminals, so the fact we could run on anything that
supported a Java VM was a definite bonus.
Of course it was too little too late for SSA; they'd spent the preceding
years just selling the same old stuff whilst competitors like SAP were
moving with the times...
cheers
Jules