I am curious, now, as to why they used this
glass-encased "metallised
paper" capacitor instead of, say, an electrolytic. There are many
electrolytics inside the PSU, so it clearly wasn't a lack of availability.
Presumably there was a specific reason they chose this type of cap over
another. I'd hate to be wrong and do worse damage.
It's an X (across-the-line) capacitor, almost certainly being used as a snubber.
For across-the-line and snubber networks metalized film/paper or foil+paper are still the
cat's meow. They have well understood failure modes. Ceramics are also rated as X
safety capacitors in some circumstances.
From the X, it's probably rated at least at 250VAC
and is non-polarized.
This is not the job for an electrolytic or an unpolarized electrolytic.
It is the job for a safety rated capacitor.
Tim.