Maybe you mean
MHz? :-). Sorry, ads where sellers claim
spectacular milliHertz performance are one of my pet peeves. (Along
with specs calling for compatibility with the ASC-2 character set
and construction plans calling for DB-9 connectors!) Though it would
be an interesting exercise to construct a Pentium II-type computer
based on relays just so that it does top out around 300 milliHertz!
No thanks... I don't have a dozen spare telephone exchanges for parts
;-)
If one were to estimate the number of transistors in a penitum II
at 100 million (?), then if an exchange has ~three relays per number,
you would get 300,000 relays in an exchange, which means 334
exchanges with a few spare parts left over!
> example, everybody around the world uses the term
"metric ton" when
> the perfectly acceptable (and SI-preferred) term "megagram" is
> exactly equivalent (and to my ears sounds better!) And why say
The reason is
that using scientific notation/unit prefixes requires
more calculation if one is not well practiced. While 90 decibels
versus 900 decibels shows the relationship clearly (for those that
know what a log is), 90 decibels vs. 90 bels is not quite as simple for
some.
90 decibels (what's wrong with 9 bels?)
1000 millibars (= 1 bar. I was told by an idiot teacher at school that
the 'bar' as a unit of pressure did not exist. A lot of books claim it
does, though).
Has anyone read the book "Innumeracy"? It mostly deals with
debunking
the concept of probability, but it is interesting in other respects,
too. BTW, would you say 'kilobyte' is a misnomer? THe number it
signifies isn't 10^3, it's 2^10. For a feeble attempt to get back on
topic: was kilobyte always accepted as 1024 bytes?
-tony
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at
http://www.hotmail.com