You haven't lived until you've compiled the Linux kernel on a Sparc1.
<grin>
The numbers are the same as your laptop with the exception of your huge
hard drive (mine was only 200mb)...
Grinning with nostalgia,
Aaron
On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Zane H. Healy wrote:
Really, in my
opinion; its not _extremely_ bad just for some basic poking
around in VMS (which is all I can really do with such a minimal install
anyways :) I once had a 386SX-16 running like Slackware Linux 3.5 as a
NAT gateway on my LAN with 4 megs of RAM... after that, pretty much
anything else seems fast (considering it pretty much ran from swap :)
Ah, BUT were you running X-Windows on that system. I've run X-Windows on a
386SX-16 Monochrome Laptop w/4MB RAM, a 387 coprocessor, and a 345MB HD.
It wasn't a lot of fun, but for what I was doing it was faster than running
MGR (which is supposed to be a really lightweight GUI for UNIX). Actually
for basic stuff X-Window performance wasn't *that* bad, it was kernel
compiles that would kill you!
Zane.
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
|
http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |