In message <m1BfQmq-000JD0C@p850ug1>
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
My guess it that it will work, but you probably
won't be able to run at
the specified maximum speed.
That's what I thought.
My expeirience is that for classic computer work, any
logic analyser,
even a 10MHz one, is a lot better than nothing, provided you know what it
can and cna't do.
Well, in this case, I'm still trying to get the hang of
the front panel
controls on the 1651B. The badly-OCRed copy of the Getting Started Guide I've
got is just about usable, but a lot of the OCR errors are subtle - changing
commands and suchlike in non-obvious ways.
I'll probably buy a manual later, but the manual comes after the pods and
cable kit on my list of priorities.
Speaking of manuals, I've got the service manual for the 1652B - no
schematics, just a boardswapping guide. Yecch.
In other words, I'd be inclined to make up
kludge-pods for this analyser
and at least try it out.
I've got it hooked up to a PICmicro development board
- it's rigged up to the
1-wire bus output. At least I know Pod 1 bit 0 works - now to test the other
31...
I don't know what machines you normally work on,
8-bit micros mainly. 6502, 8080, Z80, that sort of thing. I was going to get
one of the 80-channel HP analysers, but I decided I didn't need to probe that
many lines at once - I don't do much work on 16- and 32-bit CPUs.
but I suspect it would be easily enough for 8 bit
micros, HP calculators
(including desktops), and so on
If I need an 80 channel analyser, I'll
probably build my own - it can't be
that hard to shove a bunch of FIFOs and an oscillator on an ISA-bus card,
then write some software to drive it.
Later.
--
Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice,
http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI
... 640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates