Chris M wrote:
"What I want to do is use a modern 2.5" IDE
drive in a
legacy machine."
How modern? What machine? XT or AT class?
2.5" drives are more modern than damn near any "legacy
machine" :>
I'd like to remove the 3.5" drive in my Portable 3
and add a second floppy (since floppies on the Portable 3
seem to be flakey given its age). I would then like
to squeeze a *2.5"* drive in amongst the works and
end up with dual floppies AND a hard disk.
"the problems I am likely to face are
related to the sizes of the drives..."
Won't *any* drive work, but only to the point that
the BIOS supports it's size?
Older BIOS's and disks often didn't like it when the
disk didn;t agree with it's notion of drive geometry.
Newer drives use translation algorithms so that
internally they can think of themselves as "just a bunch
of sectors". And, have variable geometries to best
utilize the surface area and effective head velocity
over that media (media at the periphery of the drive
"moves faster" than at the hub).
I've found it easier to just force the BIOS and
drive to agree on a geometry than to leave that as
an "unknown"
"It looks like the 8/16 bit issue could be a
killer --
but I *think* that won't be in this case..."
Why? Please enlighten me.
Because the machine in question already has a 3.5"
IDE drive in it that is working fine (16 bit interface)