At 06:01 PM 3/16/98 -0500, you wrote:
[snip]
Is it this
dearth of technical information that accounts for the lack of
interest in collecting old IBM?
Yes. That and the general unhackability of the minis. And that most people
hate them. And that most universities had DECs and such in their CS
departments. And the weird parts.
But wait...
[snip]
I think also that many people really think that the old IBMs are junk.
They really are not.
Amen. You just need manuals, lots and lots of them.
I just purchased (finally found, really) a copy of
*IBM's System/360 and Early 370 Computers*, and a casual quick read
revealed that the S/360 really were very advanced machines, many of
inovations are commonplace today. Other systems, like some of the minis,
have bizarre architectures that, once inside, are fascinating. A lack of
decent development tools, however, is a real crutch. C for the S/3x line
(even Small-C) would be great.
I think a lot of people fail to consider that the IBM midrange and
mainframes were designed to run businesses without down time--the
philosophy of the engineers has always been to keep those pesky hackers out
of the system. By hackers, I mean real programmers. Of course the 360 was
supposed to be an "all around machine," but from what I've seen, business
rules at IBM.
Anyway, send me your old IBMs, size it not a problem
(while I gaze at the
photo of the multiprocessing S/370 installation).
I would if I could afford the freight. ;) I'd still like to get a 5360 to
run Displaywrite/36 folder extractions on, but I have to get the 'Vette out
of the garage and install air conditioning in the there before I can even
think about it.
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
--
David Wollmann
dwollmann(a)ibmhelp.com