15 Jan
2017
15 Jan
'17
2:52 p.m.
fyi
more common, but it has the correct depth connector on it
thought I'd post since the description isn't at all obvious what it is
http://www.ebay.com/itm/361530436227
http://www.ebay.com/itm/361530436651
15 Jan
15 Jan
5:30 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> wrote:
fyi
more common, but it has the correct depth connector on it
thought I'd post since the description isn't at all obvious what it is
http://www.ebay.com/itm/361530436227
http://www.ebay.com/itm/361530436651
Was the point there that some other extender options have connectors
that are not as deep, and therefore less desirable?
I have a 6-DE-11 dual width, dual height (Height 8.43" Width 5.2")
extender from Douglas Electronics that are available for $40 with the
optional connectors (plus shipping)
http://www.douglas.com/index.php/6-de-11.html
But maybe the connectors on the extender are not as deep as the
standard card edge fingers. I forget without taking a look.
6:02 p.m.
On 1/15/2017 2:30 PM, Glen Slick wrote:
Was the point there that some other extender options
have connectors
that are not as deep, and therefore less desirable?
I have a 6-DE-11 dual width, dual height (Height 8.43" Width 5.2")
extender from Douglas Electronics that are available for $40 with the
optional connectors (plus shipping)
http://www.douglas.com/index.php/6-de-11.html
But maybe the connectors on the extender are not as deep as the
standard card edge fingers. I forget without taking a look.
I have the Douglas extenders and it's true the connectors are not as
deep as DEC's.
They are also harder to get the boards out of.
Bob
--
Vintage computers and electronics
www.dvq.com
www.tekmuseum.com
www.decmuseum.org
2786
days inactive
2786
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
aek＠bitsavers.org -
bobalan＠sbcglobal.net -
glen.slick＠gmail.com