Even the 2.1 beta's were better than 2.0, while 2.0 was a great OS, it had several VERY annonying, very troublesome bugs. I'd say get 1.3 (totally differen't very windows like), or 2.1, but skip 2.0. IIRC 2.0 is the only software I've ever destroyed for the floppies, instead of saving (something I now regret since I'm now into preserving everything). Zane | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator | | healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast | | healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, | | see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ | | For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. | | see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |