27 Sep
27 Sep
6:47 a.m.
I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a link but no explanation
is a scam with a forged sender address.
Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want people to look at it, you
need to say what the link is.
paul
On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
9:22 a.m.
On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
I make it a habit to assume that every email which
contains just a link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address.
Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want people to look at it,
you need to say what the link is.
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
>
> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
"... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their non-linear
temporalities."
"Repair does not necessarily focus solely on ?the reproduction of social and material
order,? but also opens up space for the ?creative, inventive and innovative work that
happens in the process of fixing, across human and non-human bodies."
"... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of repair and
maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of repair while also recognizing
?traditions of women's work, domestic and reproductive labor, and all acts of
preservation, formal and informal.?"
Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in watching
ridiculous people.
11:07 a.m.
On 9/27/19 9:22 AM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
wrote:
My reaction also--bunch of word salad devoid of meaningful information
that reads like someone's attempt at a dissertation.
--Chuck
I make it a habit to assume that every email
which contains just a
link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address.
Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want
people to look at it, you need to say what the link is.
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
"... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their
non-linear temporalities."
"Repair does not necessarily focus solely on ?the reproduction of
social and material order,? but also opens up space for the
?creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process
of fixing, across human and non-human bodies."
"... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of
repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of
repair while also recognizing ?traditions of women's work, domestic
and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and
informal.?"
Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in
watching ridiculous people. 
11:23 a.m.
On 9/27/19 2:07 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
On 9/27/19 9:22 AM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
This topic has gotten far more words and attention than the poorly
written mental spew that pretends to be intellectual. If I were
grading their work it would be a D- and a fail is less significant.
The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in
reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back.
Allison
On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via
cctalk wrote:
My reaction also--bunch of word salad devoid of meaningful information
that reads like someone's attempt at a dissertation.
--Chuck
I make it a habit to assume that every email
which contains just a
link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address.
Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want
people to look at it, you need to say what the link is.
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
"... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their
non-linear temporalities."
"Repair does not necessarily focus solely on ?the reproduction of
social and material order,? but also opens up space for the
?creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process
of fixing, across human and non-human bodies."
"... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of
repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of
repair while also recognizing ?traditions of women's work, domestic
and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and
informal.?"
Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in
watching ridiculous people. 
11:59 a.m.
On Sep 27, 2019, at 11:23 AM, allison via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
This topic has gotten far more words and attention than the poorly
written mental spew that pretends to be intellectual. If I were
grading their work it would be a D- and a fail is less significant.
The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in
reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back.
Allison
Thanks Allison, you saved me from being curious!
Zane
1:56 p.m.
Al wrote....
Welcome to the world of "Digital Humanities" scholarship.
Agreed, that link was feel-good gibberish. *facepalm*
28 Sep
28 Sep
10:12 p.m.
opps? sorry? yes it is I.
In a message dated 9/27/2019 9:23:05 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at
classiccmp.org writes:
On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
I make it a habit to assume that every email which
contains just a link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address.
Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want people to look at it,
you need to say what the link is.
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
>
> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
"... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their non-linear
temporalities."
"Repair does not necessarily focus solely on ?the reproduction of social and material
order,? but also opens up space for the ?creative, inventive and innovative work that
happens in the process of fixing, across human and non-human bodies."
"... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of repair and
maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of repair while also recognizing
?traditions of women's work, domestic and reproductive labor, and all acts of
preservation, formal and informal.?"
Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in watching
ridiculous people.
1863
days inactive
1865
days old
8 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
aek＠bitsavers.org -
allisonportable＠gmail.com -
bhilpert＠shaw.ca -
cclist＠sydex.com -
couryhouse＠aol.com -
healyzh＠avanthar.com -
jwest＠classiccmp.org -
paulkoning＠comcast.net