Wanted: iUP201 modules - test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

3 Mar 2003

Hi Joe
 Yes, you are right. It was just a little brain rot on
my part.
Dwight

...
 From: Joe &lt;rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com&gt;

Dwight, 

   Are you sure that you're not thinking of the older UPP-103 EPROM programmer? 
 I know that it uses a 4040 but IIRC I've opened up an iUPP-201 and I THINK it 
used an 8085.  The iUPP-201 looks kind of like a calculator with a keyboard on 
the right side and a single line LED display above it. On the left side next to 
the keyboard is large socket for the personality adapter. The personality 
adapter has the socket for the EPROM or other device to be programmed. The older 
iUPP-103 looks like a box with a sloping front. It has two EPROM sockets on the 
right side. The personality is controlled by cards that go inside the box.  FWIW 
I picked up several more iUPP-103s with the massive load of intel stuff that I 
got just before Christmas. I found some of the cards for them but alas no CPU 
cards.  Need any parts?
...

   Joe

At 05:24 PM 3/3/03 -0800, Dwight wrote:
>Hi Joe
> When I was back at Intel, I was responsible for the test
>used by the system test on the UPP units. I can tell you a
>little bit about them.
> First, I have no idea what a "upgraded the RAM memory"
>means. These used 4002's. These work on the 4004/4040
>bus. They are completely incompatable with other types
>of RAM's and they also have input ports on them ( or
>maybe it was output but I think it was inputs ).
>The internal orginization is not compatable with ordinary
>RAM's either( not a simple power of two type addressing ).
> The main controller board has a 4040 uP with some ROM
>( 4001's ). This ROM was addressed as
>bank0. Each of the two slots for the personality cards
>was addressed as Bank0 for slot 0 and Bank1 for slot 1.
>This way, personality code could be accessed on either
>bank to run the particular operation. The code on the
>controller board ran the handshake with the parallel
>port to the Intelec system.
> I wish that I'd saved the schematics I'd had at Intel
>but I was not as smart then. I'd also made a board that
>I'd plugged into a Intelec system in place of the 4040.
>It allowed me to test the hardware and compare ROM code
>to make sure every thing was correct. This is also long
>gone.
> I once even had the ROM code for these.
>Dwight
>
>
>>From: Joe &lt;rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com&gt;
>>
>>Hi Robert,
>>
>>   Do you have any info on the internal hardware for the 201?  I have one 
>that's dead.
>>
>>   Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>At 12:01 PM 3/3/03 -0500, you wrote:
>>>Just resurrected my Intel iUP201 Universal Programmer,
>>>and am writing the control software for it (which will be
>>>available for free).
>>>
>>>I'm wondering if anyone out there has any modules for it
>>>that they want to get rid of?  I currently have the
>>>2708/2716/2732...27128 module and the 27128/27256 module.
>>>I've also upgraded the RAM memory on the programmer.
>>>
>>>I'm in Ottawa/Ontario/Canada, but will pay shipping worldwide.
>>>These things are pretty light.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>-RK
>>>
>>>--
>>>Looking for Digital Equipment Corp. PDP-1 through PDP-15 minicomputers!
>>>Robert Krten, PARSE Software Devices +1 613 599 8316.
>>>Realtime Systems Architecture, Consulting and Training at www.parse.com 