25 Apr
2002
25 Apr
'02
2:03 a.m.
On Apr 24, 21:05, Bill Pechter wrote:
Isn't it a bit much to call XXDP+ an OS.
DECX-11 is closer... XXDP's pretty dumb.
I've always thought of XXDP as the OS that DECX-11 runs under.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
25 Apr
25 Apr
5:20 p.m.
On Apr 24, 21:05, Bill Pechter wrote:
More like the program loader for the OS... 8-).
At least CP/M had better editors available than XXDP...
Bill
--
d|i|g|i|t|a|l had it THEN. Don't you wish you could still buy it now!
bpechter@shell.monmouth.com|pechter@ureach.com
Isn't it a bit much to call XXDP+ an OS.
DECX-11 is closer... XXDP's pretty dumb.
I've always thought of XXDP as the OS that DECX-11 runs under.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
8292
days inactive
8292
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
pechter＠pechter.dyndns.org -
pete＠dunnington.u-net.com