On April 14, Sridhar the POWERful wrote:
Especially since that machine isn't Qbus.
It's main bus is that 4300+
PELE stuff.
True and false. ;-)
The machine has a QBus and therefore the CPU card has a QBus interface.
So it is a QBus VAX by my definition.
The CPU board is no QBus board like the KA630..KA660. It has a special
backplane connector and the (passive) backplane distributes the signals
from this connector to the QBus slots, the memory slots and DSSI drive
bays. So this is no QBus VAX by your definition.
But that is not how I define it. The system bus of this machine is not
Qbus, so the machine is not a Qbus machine.
Why, because the memory isn't on the Qbus? The MicroVAX-II's memory
isn't on the Qbus either. The only other difference (in this context)
is the presence of a DSSI adapter on the CPU board that isn't
connected [logically] via the Qbus. Many systems have several busses.
Which do you use to define the "bus" of the machine?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Hush and eat your vegetables, young lady!"
St. Petersburg, FL - Mr. Bill
From MAILER-DAEMON Sun Apr 14 21:05:33 2002
From: MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Date: Sun Feb 27 18:05:24 2005
Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
Message-ID: <200204150205.g3F1vMf36101(a)ns2.ezwind.net>
The original message was received at Sun, 14 Apr 2002 16:59:08 -0500 (CDT)
from user(a)stl-207-206-136-99.dialup.accessus.net
[207.206.136.99]
----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----
<remove(a)randbad.com>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
<remove(a)randbad.com>om>... Deferred: Connection refused by
postoffice.randbad.com.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
Message delivered to mailing list <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>