16 Jun
2012
16 Jun
'12
6:33 p.m.
an awful lot of it seems to get done despite youre experience in the industry (10 years
ago? 20?). We had something maybe a Canon, at a job 8 years ago, often reliably taking
print and even that skinny fanfold garbage simultaneously. Did it draw 2 pages in
periodically, short of spending ~a grand, Im sure anything will. I would think an 80-90%
percent success rate for a relatively short job (i.e not long term professional activity)
would be tolerable. You can always manually redo those wayfaring missed pages. This forum
has nearly nothing to do with anything professional. But anything, including hobbies
warrants some patience. And dumping significant cash or having people tell you it cant be
done otherwise doesnt make sense.
------------------------------
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 10:51 AM PDT Dave McGuire wrote:
On 06/16/2012 01:33 PM, Chris Tofu wrote:
No the unit I already returned (unopened) wasnt
designed for big
batches or even longevity necessarily, but document feeding, the crux
of the matter, is no feat. People have and I seem to recall there
even being one commercial product that turned a copier into a
document scanner. Accurate and reliable document feeders are often
left on the side of the road.
You haven't had to work on many of them, have you. ;) I worked on
paper feed systems (Ziyad feeders for Canon CX engine-based laser
printers, as well as the printers themselves) for several years when
those printers were en vogue.
That experience left me with the sincere hope that I never have to
work on another paper-handling device again, as well as the insistence
that any printer I own will be built to print all day, every day and
likely end up being a two-man lift. (which they both are, HP 8100DN and
8550DN)
Yes, paper feeding is, in fact, a feat. Yes, it is done all over the
place, and has been for many decades, but that doesn't make it any less
a feat, nor does it make it any less failure-prone. Document feeding in
particular is much harder, because (in comparison to printing) it
suddenly matters if you pick up two sheets at once, and you can often
bet that the paper is of less-than-straight-off-the-ream edge quality
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA 
16 Jun
16 Jun
7:49 p.m.
On 06/16/2012 02:33 PM, Chris Tofu wrote:
an awful lot of it seems to get done despite youre
experience in the
industry (10 years ago? 20?).
Sure, but paper handling technology isn't anywhere near as young as
computer technology. That stuff was well-established easily half a
century before the stuff we're talking about was even thought of. I
could be wrong, but I have a very tough time believing any great
breakthroughs were made in paper handling in the past decade.
We had something maybe a Canon, at a
job 8 years ago, often reliably taking print and even that skinny
"often reliably"
fanfold garbage simultaneously. Did it draw 2 pages
in periodically,
short of spending ~a grand, Im sure anything will.
Yes, that was my point exactly.
I would think an
80-90% percent success rate for a relatively short job (i.e not long
term professional activity) would be tolerable. You can always
manually redo those wayfaring missed pages.
And if you destroy the original in the process?
This forum has nearly
nothing to do with anything professional.
I'd disagree with that.
But anything, including
hobbies warrants some patience.
You said yourself that you don't have time to find a deal on the right
tool for this job.
And dumping significant cash or
having people tell you it cant be done otherwise doesnt make sense.
I'm not telling you it can't be done. I wished you success, remember?
I just said it's very likely to be a waste of time using consumer crap,
and I hope it doesn't turn out to be frustrating for you, especially
when proper tools are at hand, and cheap.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
4579
days inactive
4579
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
mcguire＠neurotica.com -
rampaginggreenhulk＠yahoo.com