From: "Jules Richardson"
<julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 11:32 +0200, Jochen Kunz wrote:
The question is not analog vs. digital
photography. The question is when
to use what of those two mediums. They are entirely different mediums,
each with its special strengths and weakneses.
One thing I found when travelling is that it's much nicer to have a
conventional analogue film camera vs. digital. It's easy to get hold of
film (and batteries if needed) pretty much anywhere, but with digital
you have to worry about being able to recharge the camera batteries,
finding somewhere to download data off the camera every so often (or
take enough CF cards with you to cover the amount of photos you're
likely to take) etc.
cheers
Jules
Hi
I have a Canon D10. I like being able to snap
10 or 20 pictures of a child in action and not
worry about wasting film. I don't recall the
exact count but it does 2 or 3 a second.
Each is sharp enough for a 8x10.
The D20 is even better but wasn't out when I
bought the D10.
Unlike most digitals, it can be run on full
manual, semi-auto or full auto.
Dwight