On Oct 1, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
What I just cannot fathom is why they used D2! PMI is
only like 14 signals or
so (plus normal QBUS signals like BDALxx), and there are heck of a lot more
than 14 available pins on the CD that _do not_ conflict with the normal QBUS
power, etc. (You lose xS1 and xB2, but the rest all look OK, although if you
want to stay away from +5 you lose a few more.)
I had exactly the same thoughts. +5v is also the same pin as it is on
Unibus; Qbus shares Unibus' defined +5v and GND pins and adds a few more
dedicated grounds (MUB is a different matter, of course). I'm honestly
a little surprised they didn't make the power pins a little more broadly
compatible (or at least less likely to cause damage) in general, but
presumably it was a matter of many different engineering teams working
on different standards over many years.
Someone must have a bad case of brain fade, is all I
can think.... But I'm
still pretty incredulous that nobody else caught it before it was too late.
Maybe it was deliberate - they hoped to increase sales through people burning
boards out, plugging them into the wrong backplanes? (Tongue 3/4 in
cheek... :-)
I had that thought as well.
- Dave