20 Dec
2015
20 Dec
'15
7:02 a.m.
On 20 December 2015 at 07:25, Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com> wrote:
What about this one? Except for the front page and possibly the very
beginning, it seems to be the same document, but different. If it's
any better I'm not sure about, some pictures didn't do too well in the
scan, apparently.
http://www.imsai.net/download/IEEE_696_1983.pdf
Is this it?
(1983)
http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20S…
That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR. 
20 Dec
20 Dec
1:11 p.m.
On 12/20/2015 04:02 AM, Tor Arntsen wrote:
On 20 December 2015 at 07:25, Eric Smith <spacewar
at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is this it? (1983)
>>
http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20S…
>
>
>>
That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR.
What about this one? Except for the front page and possibly the very
beginning, it seems to be the same document, but different. If it's
any better I'm not sure about, some pictures didn't do too well in
the scan, apparently.
http://www.imsai.net/download/IEEE_696_1983.pdf
There's another one here also, but I assume it's also an OCR victim:
http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
--Chuck
2:13 p.m.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
There's another one here also, but I assume
it's also an OCR victim:
http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
That's interesting, and thanks for pointing it out, but it isn't the standard.
2:28 p.m.
On 12/20/2015 11:13 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chuck Guzis
<cclist at sydex.com>
wrote:
I hate to mention it, but...
Does IEEE consider this to be copyrighted material? If so, 1983+95 =
2078 when it'll be public domain, unless you count it as a "corporate"
work, in which case, it'll be available in the 22nd century.
Have you contacted the folks at IEEE for a copy?
--Chuck
There's another one here also, but I assume
it's also an OCR
victim: http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
That's interesting, and thanks for pointing it out, but it isn't the
standard.
2:35 p.m.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
Does IEEE consider this to be copyrighted material?
Of course they do.
Have you contacted the folks at IEEE for a copy?
It's withdrawn, so IEEE doesn't sell it. Most likely IHS Global
Engineering Documents does.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but that that's not what I was asking.
3:40 p.m.
If so, 1983+95 = 2078 when it'll be public domain,
Jurisdiction-dependent. Not everywhere is crazy enough to follow the
USA's disney clause (though the Berne Convention does have some
possibly-relevant reciprocal recognition clauses).
What little I've been able to find on this in a few minutes indicates
that "author's lifetime + 70" is more common than anything + 95.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
3:57 p.m.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mouse <mouse at rodents-montreal.org> wrote:
What little I've been able to find on this in a
few minutes indicates
that "author's lifetime + 70" is more common than anything + 95.
In some (many?) jurisdictions that use author's lifetime + 70, for
works of "corporate" authorship the term is 95 years from creation.
4:03 p.m.
On 12/20/2015 12:40 PM, Mouse wrote:
Regardless, it's not useful in (most) of our lifetimes--and I suspect
that Mickey will get another copyright extension anyway.
At any rate, I'm relieved that Eric found what he needed.
--Chuck
If so, 1983+95
= 2078 when it'll be public domain,
Jurisdiction-dependent. Not everywhere is crazy enough to follow
the USA's disney clause (though the Berne Convention does have some
possibly-relevant reciprocal recognition clauses).
What little I've been able to find on this in a few minutes
indicates that "author's lifetime + 70" is more common than anything
+ 95.
3138
days inactive
3138
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
cclist＠sydex.com -
kspt.tor＠gmail.com -
mouse＠Rodents-Montreal.ORG -
spacewar＠gmail.com