On Oct 7 2005, 12:51, Hans Franke wrote:
Am 7 Oct 2005 0:09 meinte Pete Turnbull:
> As some of you know, I'm helping with an exhibition of classic
> machines in the Department of Computer Science -- for Open Day
> tomorrow (Friday), and running conducted tours on Wednesday as
well.
[ ... ]
> Well, one of the supposedly-working exhibits is
my KIM-1, but it
> died this afternoon.
That's unusual, standard procedure is that a
machine dies at
the opening day at the first real presentation - no matter
how often you testet before.
:-)
Well, I *was* demoing it to the organisers and senior staff...
Final death toll was one KIM-1, the top 1K of my Commodore PET (one of
the early ones with the nasty MOS Technology 6550 RAMs) and a Mac Plus
which got rather unhappy midmorning. Probably all fixable in one way
or another.
"Thank you" to the various people who replied about the KIM. I never
had time to look at it again this week, perhaps I'll have a go at the
weekend. I did actually know about the site that several of you
mentioned, and I also have the schematic and most manuals, just not
handy at the time, so I was really just wondering if there was a common
failure mode. The suggestion of using small components on the back,
out of sight, is an interesting one, though, and the suggestions made
about other methods may be helpful too.
In other respects the tours for the students were a great success --
and the staff loved them. Some went and fetched their colleagues and
came back with them!
We had a display of generations of computing from a 1920s mechanical
card tabulator through bits of ENIAC (valve), Pegasus (valve), LEO
(transistor, well the last version was anyway), and various TTL-based
boards (some SSI, some with 74181 MSI ALUs, etc) to LSI/VLSI ending up
with an 8008 board (we don't seem to have a 4004 between us,
surprisingly -- if anyone would like to donate one for next time, feel
free ;-)). We had a display of three generations (densities) of core
memory, static and dynamic RAM chips and SIMMS/DIMMS/etc, several
generations of EPROMS (oh, and a diode ROM board) and a few chips to
see under a fairly powerful binocular microscope. We had a whole range
of drives and discs, from RK05 to modern SCSI,including some hard
drives running with perspex covers, and all sorts of floppies,
stiffies, flopticals and zips, and tapes from paper tape (one of the
quiz questions was how much paper tape would it take to store the same
data as you'd fit on a 3.5" floppy?) through 1/2" magtape and C10
cassettes to TK50s, DLT-IVs and 200GB LTO Ultrium-IIs.
The microcomputer section included an Altair 8800B, some S100 cards,
Motorola MK6800D2, KIM-1, Scrumpi (an SC/MP kit), PET (running
moonlander), Apple ][ (displaying a rolling demo of digitised pics), a
BBC micro running games and with no less than 4 second processors, an
untidy heap[1] of "lots of micros from the late 70s and early 80s", an
Apple Mac (supposedly running Pagemaker 1.0 but that was the Mac that
got ill) with a modified "1984" promo video[2] at the side, an original
pristine 5160 PC/XT, an Amiga, and an Acorn Archimedes.
[1] the "untidy heap" was to convey the idea of the explosion of micros
that appeared around this time, and included -- some with the tops off
-- Exidy Sorcerer, Acorn Atom, TRS-80, Sharp MZ80K, Sinclair ZX80,
TI99/4, Sinclair ZX81, Jupiter Ace, Sinclair Spectrum, Dragon 32,
Vic-20, Acorn Electron, Sinclair Spectrum Plus, Commodore 64,
Commodore 128, Sinclair QL, Sony MSX and probably a couple I've
forgotten.
Altogether, we counted 16 different microprocessors in the display
(another pop quiz question the students were supposed to answer).
[2] the video is the 2004 version where the runner is wearing an iPod.
We wondered (another quiz question: what was the anachronism) how many
students would not notice the iPod because they're so common now, but
most of them spotted it. What most didn't get without prompting was
the question about how that related to the displays on either side --
which were an Acorn ARM Development system and an Archimedes (with an
ARM processor). We also asked them what the most common microprocessor
is, and a small number thought it was a Pentium (which doesn't even
make the top three, actually).
The "business and scientific" section covered a longer period, starting
with a PDP-8/E (pop quiz: which machine has been through a dishwasher?)
with attached ASR33 and which was running the inchworm and basic
accumulator test programs, as well as a little routine to punch "HELLO,
WORLD!" souveniers on tape (written by one of the staff who'd never
seen PDP-8 code before, so he was dead pleased when it worked). Then
we had an 11/40 opened up to the gaze of the onlookers (plus the "Ken
and Den" photo at the side) and boards from an 11/03, 11/23, and 11/73,
followed by a microVAX-II (no room for an 11/780, alas). The final
item in that row was a 20-year-old working 11/53 system running an exam
marking system under RSX-11M, with a mark-sense reader -- which booted
first time and ran without problem all week, demonstrating -- as we
hoped and expected -- that things were built to be reliable in those
days. The other side of that aisle was mostly RISC-based machines,
starting with an early Sparcstation, then the first microSPARC, a Mac
Classic (last 68K Mac, first under 1000UKP), then Indigo, Indy and O2
SGI workstations (what machine do you see in Jurassic Park?) running
assorted demos and finally a modern mid-range dual-processor Sun
server.
Note the complete absence of Wintel PCs (apart from the 5160) :-) We
managed to relegate them to a corner table of their own, but we did
have a full range of motherboards from XT (couldn't find a 5150 in
time), through AT, 386, 486, assorted Pentium and AMDs to a big
dual-core machine that will finally be put into service on Friday.
The last section was sort of unusual odds and ends -- a piece of one of
the Crays the Meteorological Office used to use for forecasting, some
transputer boards from a Meganode and a Paramid system, a Presence-II
neural net processor board (a PCI card designed and built by the
Advanced Computer Architectures group at the University), one module
from my Origin 2000 "supercomputer" with some
superfluous Craylinks to
make more lights flash, an Origin 200, and some FPGA stuff
from
CompSci.
We also had some pieces of Elliot 803 and English Electric KDF9 along
with someone who had actually worked on these systems, and could talk
enthusiastically about the novel and innovative aspects of their
architectures, but sadly he got called away mid-morning.
We all had an interesting and enjoyable day, though some of us are a
bit hoarse from running sixteen tour groups through our parts of the
exhibition! One of the technicians took lots of photos so I'll see if
I can pick some out when I get a set and put them up online somewhere.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York