Tony Duell wrote:
>The first step was to check for any damaged
components or traces, but
>none were apparent, so I just gave it a go. Before the variac police
>come and get me, it was powered up just before I received it.
...
>Miraculously, it simply just worked. I imagine the
smoke that the
>original owner experience was due to dust on the CRT burning off. I
>have no other explanation.
...
dead (I
should mention I scoped the read logic and it was detecting
It's one possibilty. It could also have been a lot of other things, drive
or controller related. Personally, I'd have done a lot more tests before
twiddling anything (but then again, I once spent an afternoon figuring
out why a CBM 8250 was ubreliable on one drive, only to find the cause
was dirty heads...)
True, in an ideal world I would have the time to do stuff like that.
For my job I get paid to spend the time to do things right. For home
projects where I can sometimes go weeks without a free hour and more
typically have one to two hours a night to tinker, I get a lot more fast
and loose. Tony, as far as I can tell, your job *is* answering cctalk
questions. :-)
transitions).
I finally just twiddled with the speed pot to find that
the speed was way off. Although incandescents have a lot of glow during
the power line's zero crossing, near the right speed I could see the
strobe pattern well enough. The real reason I couldn't see the pattern
was that the speed had been so far off.
Did it look like it'd been twiddled before? If not, then I wonder if some
other component (capacitor?) is failing, and the speed will therefore
drift again.
There was no seal on the pot so there is no way to tell if it had been
adjusted. It very well might drift later. For now my concern is to
recover the data off the disks, and my quick and dirty adjustment has
served its purpose. If I was spending a lot of time using the machine
I'd be more concerned about it.
...
>>Now the main problem is pincushioning and color convergence. I did some
>>simple adjustments to improve color convergence, but without doing
>>something much more involved, it isn't possible to get all regions to
>>converge at the same time. For now I'll just live with the problem.
> Assuming this is an in-line gun CRT, you normally use the ring magnets on
> the back of the yoke to do the static (centre) convergence, then
> tilt/wedge the yoke to get the edges right. But sort out that
> pincushioning -- which could well be a component failure in the raster
> correction circuit -- first.
> Most colour monitors, at least over here,
followed pretty standard
> designs at that time. If the monitor was built by a consumer electronics
> compeany (NEC, Hitachi, Zenith, etc), look at the service manuals for
> contemporary TVs from the same manufacturer.
I have the service manual that compucolor put out for the machine. they
give a procedure for doing a quick and dirty alignment (twiddle four
pots corresponding to convergence in the top, bottom, left, and right
sides of the screen) and a more involved one if the quick and dirty one
doesn't work. It didn't involve adjusting yoke magnets, just pots.
Tony you may shake your head at my cavalier attitude about the state of
the hardware, but I feel like what I'm doing isn't harming the machine
and if I (or the next owner) wants to do it right, I haven't precluded
that. My only interest right now is archiving what I can (scanning
manuals, capturing disks, etc.)