19 Jul
2007
19 Jul
'07
8:53 a.m.
Has anyone else read this short tech news piece? Wow, how do they do that?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/07/ebuyer_runs_site_on_commodore64/
Best, David
David Greelish
classiccomputing.com
The Classic Computing Podcast
Home of Computer History Nostalgia
Stan Veit's History of the Personal Computer
Audio Book Podcast
19 Jul
19 Jul
12:39 p.m.
On 7/19/07, David Greelish <dgreelish at mac.com> wrote:
Has anyone else read this short tech news piece? Wow,
how do they do that?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/07/ebuyer_runs_site_on_commodore64/
Presumably by tweaking the string inside Apache that self-reports the platform.
In 1995-1996, I ran a webserver on my Amiga, but there's plenty of
memory, a network interface, a decent C environment, etc., available
to AmigaDOS. It's not impossible to run a webserver on a C-64 (it's
been done several times already), but I'd say that you aren't likely
to be running _Apache_ on an 8-bit 1980s micro, even if you do slap on
a couple megs of peripheral RAM and an Ethernet interface (or use
SLIP/PPP).
-ethan
12:41 p.m.
David Greelish wrote:
Has anyone else read this short tech news piece? Wow,
how do they do that?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/07/ebuyer_runs_site_on_commodore64/
How do they do it? They hack their Apache to show a fake identifier.
Peace... Sridhar
2:17 p.m.
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
How do they do it? They hack their Apache to show a
fake identifier.
That's exactly what they've done. If you want to experience an actual
Commodore 64 being used as a web server, check out:
http://www.c64web.com/
--
Golan Klinger <gklinger at gmail.com>
Dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.
2:26 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 05:53:08AM -0700, David Greelish wrote:
Has anyone else read this short tech news piece? Wow,
how do they do that?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/07/ebuyer_runs_site_on_commodore64/
Thats easy, the just set up their Apache to show a "slightly modified"
version string, thats all.
A few years ago I had my local squid cache set up so it would replace
the UserAgent string in HTTP requests proxied through it with something
like 'TerminalWeb 1.5; Multics; 36 bits' - it was very interesting to
see which poorly created web sites this broke (because they relied on
the UserAgent string to show you browser specific content).
Regards,
Alex.
--
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison
2:56 p.m.
Alexander Schreiber wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 05:53:08AM -0700, David
Greelish wrote:
I did something similar to make my Mozilla Seamonkey appear to be
Internet Explorer. It's amazing how many lazy web developers create web
pages that reject non-IE browsers, but when tested, their sites work
fine with Mozilla.
Peace... Sridhar
Has anyone else read this short tech news piece?
Wow, how do they do that?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/07/ebuyer_runs_site_on_commodore64/
Thats easy, the just set up their Apache to show a "slightly modified"
version string, thats all.
A few years ago I had my local squid cache set up so it would replace
the UserAgent string in HTTP requests proxied through it with something
like 'TerminalWeb 1.5; Multics; 36 bits' - it was very interesting to
see which poorly created web sites this broke (because they relied on
the UserAgent string to show you browser specific content).
6214
days inactive
6214
days old
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
als＠thangorodrim.de -
dgreelish＠mac.com -
ethan.dicks＠gmail.com -
gklinger＠gmail.com -
ploopster＠gmail.com