6 Apr
1998
6 Apr
'98
8:15 p.m.
[Autocad not requiring math coprocessor]
Well, version 12 for Dos, which is what I have, seems to require it.
It refuses to start up, quitting with "80x87 required, but not
present". Whoever said it doesn't, maybe you have a lower version.
If so, which and what's it like? I would certainly be interested in
an older version, such a 7 or 8.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
6 Apr
6 Apr
9:27 p.m.
Max Eskin wrote:
[Autocad not requiring math coprocessor]
Well, version 12 for Dos, which is what I have, seems to require it.
It refuses to start up, quitting with "80x87 required, but not
present". Whoever said it doesn't, maybe you have a lower version.
If so, which and what's it like? I would certainly be interested in
an older version, such a 7 or 8.
There used to be some either shareware or commercial ware that would
trick the system into thinking there was a mathco installed, at either
the 8087 or 80287 level. I used to run an older AutoCad and Lotus with
it and while it didn't speed anything up it also didn't slow it down.
You might check Shareware.com, Download.Com, Jumbo.Com, etc for it.
Someone posted a Big Blue archive site a while ago that might have it
too. At least for testing anyway. Mathcoprocessors themselves are very
inexpensive anymore but this allows you to at least check it out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ # 1714857
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Apr
7 Apr
1:22 a.m.
Max Eskin wrote:
[Autocad not requiring math coprocessor]
Well, version 12 for Dos, which is what I have, seems to require it.
It refuses to start up, quitting with "80x87 required, but not
present". Whoever said it doesn't, maybe you have a lower version.
If so, which and what's it like? I would certainly be interested in
an older version, such a 7 or 8.
I don't remember the version number, we're not merely talking _old_,
we're talking ancient -- I used to mess about with AutoCAD on the
Tandy 2000 back in 1986 -- an 80186 CPU with no coprocessor (and the
8087 option for the Tandy 2000 was expensive, involving a swapout of
the motherboard).
--
Ward Griffiths
They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.
Of course, the main reason they cuddle up is to screw somebody else.
Michael Flynn, _Rogue Star_
2:27 a.m.
Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
Max Eskin wrote:
Try running it on a Sanyo MBC-55x-2 with an 8088 processor and NO Alt
key. An 8087 was around $125 then. I've had handfuls of them in boxes
since then.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ # 1714857
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[Autocad not requiring math coprocessor]
Well, version 12 for Dos, which is what I have, seems to require it.
It refuses to start up, quitting with "80x87 required, but not
present". Whoever said it doesn't, maybe you have a lower version.
If so, which and what's it like? I would certainly be interested in
an older version, such a 7 or 8.
I don't remember the version number, we're not merely talking _old_,
we're talking ancient -- I used to mess about with AutoCAD on the
Tandy 2000 back in 1986 -- an 80186 CPU with no coprocessor (and the
8087 option for the Tandy 2000 was expensive, involving a swapout of
the motherboard).
9780
days inactive
9781
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
gram＠cnct.com -
maxeskin＠hotmail.com -
rhblake＠bbtel.com