>>>> "Zane" == Zane H Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> writes:
Zane> At 9:19 AM -0400 6/23/05, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>>>> "Zane" ==
Zane H Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> writes:
>>
Zane> As I understand it, the issue was with variable byte blocks. I
Zane> had zero issues installing RSTS/E, and I think a couple layered
Zane> products off of 4mm DAT. However, DECnet/E would not install
Zane> off of DAT.
> You mean variable length blocks? If it
doesn't support that, it
> isn't a proper tape. Proper tapes handle any block size, odd or
> even, from 14 up to at least 8k or so.
Zane> Yes, that's what I mean. It is my understanding from when I
Zane> got some help figuring this out (I think by this list), that
Zane> was the problem. It wouldn't install from DAT, but had zero
Zane> issues with TK50.
Ok. RSTS does assume/require that tapes are designed by competent
designers. I'm surprised you didn't run into similar issues with
other operating systems.
He should have. RSX expects tape drive to be able to deliver variable size
blocks as well. The distribution tapes hold 512 byte, 80 byte and 4144
byte size records. (As well as 0 byte file mark records.)
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol