29 Jan
2002
29 Jan
'02
2:37 a.m.
----------
From: Doc
<<<<<clipped>>>>>
But I think that in a day or 2 I'll probably be
tied for the
*smallest* classic Unix box in the house. Part of this weekend's haul
was an SE/30, I found an ethernet adapter today, and I went to storage
this evening and dug out the 4M 30-pin SIMM stash. A/UX here I come....
Doc
-------
Doc ---
Well, if I have my way, my Gateway Handbook will be a smaller Unix
box... 10" x 6" x 1.5" ;-)
And it just squeaks by 10 years old too ( I think, maybe 9...)
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
29 Jan
29 Jan
3:42 a.m.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, David Woyciesjes wrote:
Doc ---
Well, if I have my way, my Gateway Handbook will be a smaller Unix
box... 10" x 6" x 1.5" ;-)
And it just squeaks by 10 years old too ( I think, maybe 9...)
Funny you should mention that. I'm supposed to pick up a Handbook
this weekend, to see about installing Linux without removing the drive.
It's an indefinite loan, drat it.
The owner was trying to install on it last year, put the problem to
the local LUG list, and started a huge flame war. I emailed him last
week to see if he'd been successful, and he said he'd thrown it back in
the closet in disgust. But I'm getting a chance to try my hand at it.
I'd *really* like to have a Handbook of my own. Classic or not,
they're Way Too Cool (tm). Hopefully, by the time I'm done with John's,
I'll be affluent again.
Doc
30 Jan
30 Jan
4:28 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
But I think
that in a day or 2 I'll probably be tied for the
*smallest* classic Unix box in the house. Part of this weekend's haul
was an SE/30, I found an ethernet adapter today, and I went to storage
this evening and dug out the 4M 30-pin SIMM stash. A/UX here I
come.... 
4:57 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
A/UX runs on SE/30s?
My smallest UNIX boxes are either my PS/2 model E (the size of a single
volume of an encyclopaedia w/2.5" hard disk, 1 ISA slot and a quad-
PCMCIA adapter) or one of my keyboard PCs (a 5"x5" main board, with a
2.5" HD and laptop floppy, built-in NE2K NIC, stashed in a 2"-tall metal
frame that is bolted to a standard-sized 101 key keyboard). Both are
running RedHat.
My smallest UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator. Followed closely
by a Toshiba Libretto.
The PS/2-E does *not* have the LCD monitor that came
with it originally,
but at least it was only $15 when I got it. If a monitor is "required"
to complete the system, I would have to say that I typically used it
with a Compaq Aero laptop - a sub-notebook about 40% the size of the
PS/2-E - and Kermit on a serial line for a console, not a keyboard and
tube.
Those monitors are getting kinda hard to find.
Peace... Sridhar
8:49 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
--- Julius Sridhar <vance(a)ikickass.org> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
They always _were_ hard to find... unless you wanted to pay several
times the cost of the computer for them. Tiny passive-scan LCDs
as I recall...
The idea was sound - an ultra-low-power desktop... too bad it's a
386SX-16 w/8Mb of RAM max. :-P I have mine running RedHat, but
it takes an eternity to boot up.
As proof of the value of classic machines, it saw hundreds of hours of
use in 2000 as a faux-router/firewall (with 4 3C589 cards in it).
We used it on our development LAN to similate Cisco hardware (to
a near enough approximation from the application's standpoint - all
it had to do was simulate a secure LAN with several DMZs - no actual
security was required for the proof-of-concept, just reasonable IP
addresses). We _didn't_ go out and buy a duplicate set of hardware
for our play-LAN and saved about $20K. I still got laid-off, though;
so I took my toys and went home!
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com
The PS/2-E does *not* have the LCD monitor that
came with it
originally...
Those monitors are getting kinda hard to find. 
12:46 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
My smallest UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator.
Explain explain explain!
Followed closely by a Toshiba Libretto.
Lovely little machines :-) they almost make me like PCs.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up. -- 1 Corinthians 8:1 ---------------
11 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
Well, it's a tiny little calculator based on a 10 MHz 68000 and 188KB of
RAM, and 320 KB Flash ROM. It has a QWERTY keyboard and a 240X180 (?)
screen. Check out http://www.ticalc.org/ and look under TI-92+.
I love my Libretto. I wouldn't like it so much with Windows. The
Thinkpad X series is almost as good.
Peace... Sridhar
My smallest
UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator.
Explain explain explain! Followed
closely by a Toshiba Libretto.
Lovely little machines :-) they almost make me like PCs.
11:26 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
--- Julius Sridhar <vance(a)ikickass.org> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
Well, it's a tiny little calculator based on a 10 MHz 68000 and 188KB of
RAM, and 320 KB Flash ROM. It has a QWERTY keyboard and a 240X180 (?)
screen. Check out http://www.ticalc.org/ and look under TI-92+.
Looks way cool. The 68000 is one of my favorite chips, too. The
bad news is the price... I just looked up several auctions on ePay
and find that they auction for more than my iOpener or my Audrey. :-(
Still... if I ever run across one for under $100 (hah!), I'll probably
pick it up and throw UNIX on it.
With that tiny screen, can you still play rogue on it? NetHack? I'd
throw a Z-machine interpreter on it if there were enough room... Zork
anyone? (I suppose one could port a Z-machine interpreter to assembler;
the data files start around 90KB for the oldest Infocom games - that
begs the question, though: does it have a RAM disk with a filesystem?)
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com
My
smallest UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator.
Explain explain explain!
11:47 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
Well, it's a tiny little calculator based on a 10 MHz 68000 and 188KB of
RAM, and 320 KB Flash ROM. It has a QWERTY keyboard and a 240X180 (?)
screen. Check out http://www.ticalc.org/ and look under TI-92+.
Looks way cool. The 68000 is one of my favorite chips, too. The
bad news is the price... I just looked up several auctions on ePay
and find that they auction for more than my iOpener or my Audrey. :-(
I was a math major, so my parents popped the $200 at the time to buy it.
Regular retail now is around $160. It has *powerful* calculator
functions.
My smallest
UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator.
Explain explain explain! Still... if I ever run across one for under $100
(hah!), I'll probably
pick it up and throw UNIX on it.
With that tiny screen, can you still play rogue on it? NetHack? I'd
throw a Z-machine interpreter on it if there were enough room... Zork
anyone? (I suppose one could port a Z-machine interpreter to assembler;
the data files start around 90KB for the oldest Infocom games - that
begs the question, though: does it have a RAM disk with a filesystem?)
Good question. I've never looked how storage is allocated. I'll look it
up and let you know.
Peace... Sridhar
31 Jan
31 Jan
1 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
Tiny little calculator???? It's the biggest modern calculator I've ever
seen!! Any bigger and it would be a laptop!
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
Julius Sridhar wrote:
Well, it's a tiny little calculator based on a 10
MHz 68000 and 188KB of
RAM, and 320 KB Flash ROM. It has a QWERTY keyboard and a 240X180 (?)
screen. Check out http://www.ticalc.org/ and look under TI-92+.
1:24 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chad Fernandez wrote:
Tiny little calculator???? It's the biggest
modern calculator I've ever
seen!! Any bigger and it would be a laptop!
Any smaller and the QWERTY keyboard wouldn't fit.
Peace... Sridhar
30 Jan
30 Jan
6:42 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chad Fernandez wrote:
It's the separate numeric keypad, function keys (F1-F8) and the cursor
control pad that makes it so big :)
I got mine when it first came out when I started going back to school a
few years back. I was the envy of the class ;)
I think I'll fire mine up for old times sake and see about putting Unix on
it.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Tiny little calculator???? It's the biggest
modern calculator I've ever
seen!! Any bigger and it would be a laptop!
Any smaller and the QWERTY keyboard wouldn't fit.
31 Jan
31 Jan
9:01 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Sellam Ismail wrote:
It's the separate numeric keypad, function keys (F1-F8) and the cursor
control pad that makes it so big :)
I got mine when it first came out when I started going back to school a
few years back. I was the envy of the class ;)
I think I'll fire mine up for old times sake and see about putting Unix on
it.
I would suggest that you call up TI and get a TI-92+ Module Upgrade. It
adds a crapload of RAM, as well as 320kB ROM, some math functions, and
expanded OS capabilities. It's neat, and it's about $75.
Peace... Sridhar
Tiny little calculator???? It's the biggest
modern calculator I've ever
seen!! Any bigger and it would be a laptop!
Any smaller and the QWERTY keyboard wouldn't fit.
3 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
Late 95, right?
How does one go about installing Unix? What distribution do you use?
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
Sellam Ismail wrote:
I got mine when it first came out when I started going
back to school a
few years back. I was the envy of the class ;)
I think I'll fire mine up for old times sake and see about putting Unix on
it.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
11:54 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Chad Fernandez wrote:
Late 95, right?
Something like that.
How does one go about installing Unix? What
distribution do you use?
A customized proprietary version of MINIX. You need a TI Graph Link (or
homemade version) cable.
Peace... Sridhar
4:53 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
Hi,
Julius Sridhar <vance(a)ikickass.org> said:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chad Fernandez wrote:
The Sharp Zaurus Linux-powered PDA has a qwerty keyboard...but I don't think
anyone will be touch-typing on it! Looks very interesting all the same...
--
Cheers,
Stan Barr stanb(a)dial.pipex.com
The future was never like this!
Tiny little calculator???? It's the biggest
modern calculator I've ever
seen!! Any bigger and it would be a laptop!
Any smaller and the QWERTY keyboard wouldn't fit.
4:05 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
Well, it's a tiny little calculator based on a 10 MHz 68000 and 188KB of
RAM, and 320 KB Flash ROM. It has a QWERTY keyboard and a 240X180 (?)
screen. Check out http://www.ticalc.org/ and look under TI-92+.
Man, I haven't been to that site since high school, when I downloaded some
games for my 85. I have a 92+ and will check this out!
--
Jeffrey S. Sharp
jss(a)subatomix.com
My
smallest UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator.
Explain explain explain!
9:04 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jeffrey S. Sharp wrote:
Well, it's a tiny little calculator based on a 10 MHz 68000 and 188KB of
RAM, and 320 KB Flash ROM. It has a QWERTY keyboard and a 240X180 (?)
screen. Check out http://www.ticalc.org/ and look under TI-92+.
Man, I haven't been to that site since high school, when I downloaded some
games for my 85. I have a 92+ and will check this out!
I think you will be surprised how much easier it is to use assembler on
the 92+ as compared to the 85. The 89/92/92+ rocks.
Peace... Sridhar
My smallest
UNIX box right now is my TI-92 calculator.
Explain explain explain! 
30 Jan
30 Jan
4:58 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
My smallest UNIX boxes are either my PS/2 model E (the
size of a
single volume of an encyclopaedia w/2.5" hard disk, 1 ISA slot and a
quad- PCMCIA adapter) or one of my keyboard PCs (a 5"x5" main board,
with a 2.5" HD and laptop floppy, built-in NE2K NIC, stashed in a
2"-tall metal frame that is bolted to a standard-sized 101 key
keyboard). Both are running RedHat.
Do bare SBC computers count? I had a link to one guy who set up a computer
the size of a matchbox, and one the size of a 72 pin SIMM. Both ran Linux
and the Apache webserver.
The PS/2-E does *not* have the LCD monitor that came
with it
originally, but at least it was only $15 when I got it. If a monitor
is "required" to complete the system, I would have to say that I
typically used it with a Compaq Aero laptop - a sub-notebook about 40%
the size of the PS/2-E - and Kermit on a serial line for a console,
not a keyboard and tube.
I've got a Contura Aero myself, tho slightly upgraded since it was bought
from Compaq. Mine currently has 20MB of ram and 4GB of
hard drive. It
originally came with 4MB of ram and 80MB of hard drive. You would
not
believe the pain and suffering that was involved in getting a non-dos os
installed on the thing.
If someone has a Contura Aero 4/33C or parts for the Contura Aero line
they want to get rid of sometime, send me an email. I've always wanted to
add a 4/33C to my collection of unusual systems.
-Toth
5:17 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
I've got a Contura Aero myself, tho slightly
upgraded since it was bought
from Compaq. Mine currently has 20MB of ram and 4GB of hard drive. It
originally came with 4MB of ram and 80MB of hard drive. You would not
believe the pain and suffering that was involved in getting a non-dos os
installed on the thing.
Yes, I would. I've installed NetBSD on an IBM PS/1.
Peace... Sridhar
If someone has a Contura Aero 4/33C or parts for the
Contura Aero line
they want to get rid of sometime, send me an email. I've always wanted to
add a 4/33C to my collection of unusual systems.
-Toth
6:19 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
-Toth
I've got a Contura Aero myself, tho slightly
upgraded since it was bought
from Compaq. Mine currently has 20MB of ram and 4GB of hard drive. It
originally came with 4MB of ram and 80MB of hard drive. You would not
believe the pain and suffering that was involved in getting a non-dos os
installed on the thing.
Yes, I would. I've installed NetBSD on an IBM PS/1.
8:50 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
It isn't worth it. They are slow, useless PC's that have parts of DOS
burned into ROM.
Peace... Sridhar
Yes, I would.
I've installed NetBSD on an IBM PS/1.
I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
10:35 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
It isn't worth it. They are slow, useless PC's that have parts of DOS
burned into ROM.
Woo...sounds like a real challenge then :)
I'll save it as a project for a slow month sometime.
-Toth
Yes, I
would. I've installed NetBSD on an IBM PS/1.
I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
10:53 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
It isn't worth it. They are slow, useless PC's that have parts of DOS
burned into ROM.
Woo...sounds like a real challenge then :)
I'll save it as a project for a slow month sometime.
They're beyond challenging. They're painful. Every thing that could be
badly designed, is.
Peace... Sridhar
Yes, I would.
I've installed NetBSD on an IBM PS/1.
I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
11:56 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
Woo...sounds like a real challenge then :)
I'll save it as a project for a slow month sometime.
They're beyond challenging. They're painful. Every thing that could
be badly designed, is.
Well now, that sounds like my kind of project :)
Is the PS/1 computer I described even the same one you mentioned?
-Toth
> Yes, I would. I've installed NetBSD on an
IBM PS/1.
I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
It isn't worth it. They are slow, useless PC's that have parts of DOS
burned into ROM.
12:32 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
They're beyond challenging. They're painful. Every thing that could
be badly designed, is.
Well now, that sounds like my kind of project :)
Is the PS/1 computer I described even the same one you mentioned?
Well, the ones I am talking about are all IBM PS/1's. The later ones are
basically Aptiva's (craptiva's), and are built by Acer, rather than
IBM-PCCO/Guadalajara.
Peace... Sridhar
> > Yes,
I would. I've installed NetBSD on an IBM PS/1.
>
> I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
> hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
> to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
It isn't worth it. They are slow, useless PC's that have parts of DOS
burned into ROM.
Woo...sounds like a real challenge then :)
I'll save it as a project for a slow month sometime. 
12:27 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
Once you've bypassed the Stub in ROM which had the quad menu they are
as useful as any box of that era. My 2133 386 was the equal of any of the
clones and also with IBM support. I have a PS/1 2111 286 that has a great
display (the PSU was in the monitor module) and ran Win better than most
of the other clones and the the 5170 as well.
Lawrence
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
Woo...sounds like a real challenge then :)
I'll save it as a project for a slow month sometime.
They're beyond challenging. They're painful. Every thing that could be
badly designed, is.
Peace... Sridhar
Reply to:
lgwalker(a)mts.net
> Yes, I would. I've installed NetBSD on an
IBM PS/1.
I believe I have one of these systems out in storage, but it is lacking a
hard drive. The one I have has (I think) 3 cables that connect the display
to the computer. I guess I should find it and see exactly what it is.
It isn't worth it. They are slow, useless PC's that have parts of DOS
burned into ROM.
7:06 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
A/UX runs on SE/30s?
So sayeth the A/UX FAQ, and a perusal of the old UseNet archives (May
Google be blessed 10,000 times) seems to support the notion.
But.... See my post about it later.
Doc
7:40 a.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Doc wrote:
And should A/UX be too difficult to find, there's always NetBSD/mac68k.
-brian.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
A/UX runs on
SE/30s?
So sayeth the A/UX FAQ, and a perusal of the old UseNet archives (May
Google be blessed 10,000 times) seems to support the notion.
But.... See my post about it later. 
9:24 a.m.
New subject: OT: RE: Small UNIX boxes
Quite off-topic, but probably of interest --
For small Unix machines, how about the wristwatch that runs Linux and
uses X11 for the display, developed at IBM?
The original prototype used a small backlit LCD display, but the latest
version uses an Organic LED (OLED) display that is absolutely stunning!
The machine runs with an ARM 7 CPU (Cirrus Logic EP7211), 8 Megs of
flash memory and 8 Megs of DRAM. The OLED display is 640x480. It has a
built-in Bluetooth transceiver, Lithium Polymer rechargeable battery, a
combination of touch screen and a jog dial for user interface, infra-red
interface. The watch 'program' is 'xclock'!
There's a great article (with lots of pix) about the development in the
latest edition of IEEE's "Computer" journal (January 2002).
Regards,
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Web Museum
http://www.geocities.com/oldcalculators
1 Feb
1 Feb
10:59 p.m.
New subject: Small UNIX boxes (was RE: Netscape (was Re: PayPal = payola?))
At 10:28 AM 30/01/2002 -0800, Ethan Dicks wrote:
A/UX runs on SE/30s?
Sure does. I moved the hard drive from my IIcx to a "spare SE/30" while the
IIcx was being repaired and it "just worked". Foolishly I moved things back
to the IIcx when it was fixed, the SE/30 would have been more portable. I
guess, 10 years later, I could just go get an SE/30 for a few dollars and
"upgrade".
Huw Davies | e-mail: Huw.Davies(a)kerberos.davies.net.au
| "If God had wanted soccer played in the
| air, the sky would be painted green"
But I think that in a day or 2 I'll probably be
tied for the
*smallest* classic Unix box in the house. Part of this weekend's haul
was an SE/30, I found an ethernet adapter today, and I went to storage
this evening and dug out the 4M 30-pin SIMM stash. A/UX here I
come....
8128
days inactive
8132
days old
30 comments
14 participants
participants (14)
-
DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu -
doc＠mdrconsult.com -
erd_6502＠yahoo.com -
fernande＠internet1.net -
foo＠siconic.com -
Huw.Davies＠kerberos.davies.net.au -
jss＠subatomix.com -
lgwalker＠mts.net -
rickb＠bensene.com -
spectre＠stockholm.ptloma.edu -
stanb＠dial.pipex.com -
tothwolf＠concentric.net -
vance＠ikickass.org -
vaxzilla＠jarai.org