I asked a friend of mine at NASA about this and here's his reply. As Dick said,
the whole thing is "Greatly Exaggerated."
For the ones of you that may not be aware of it, NASA, military contractors,
universities and many businesses are ALWAYS looking for old hardware to keep their
specailized systems going. I've sold a ton of HP equipment to many of them for spares.
I even sold one HP 9000 that is now in Antarctica. Their old one died suddenly and they
flew someone from South Africa to the US to pick this one up and then flew with it to
Antarctica. In many cases the users would have to go through a lengthy and costly process
to certify new systems so it's better to buy replacement parts for the old system
instead of upgrading. For example, last year I repaired two HP-41 calculators for Air
France and I was WELL paid for it. I asked them why they didn't upgrade to HP-42s that
are SW compatible with the HP-41 or to a newer calculator with rewritten SW. They said
that since they were using them INSIDE the Concorde it was considered flight hardware and
that it would take at least three years and !
cost in excess of $20,000 to certify a replacement.
Joe
> Ray,
>
> Have you heard anything about this? It sounds pretty wild to me.
>
Very possible. The old Launch Processing System (LPS) uses "Micomp"
floppies. NASA is using the Shuttle way beyond the life expectancy. Many
of the old instruments are breaking down. NASA goes looking for an exact
replacement because it would cost too much to re-qualify new hardware. This
probably goes for firmand software too.