jpero skrev:
> I've sent a mail inquiring the hardware guy,
he's having a go at another
> 64- pin adapter now. =)
Or if 98% of pins are standard in places, cut few
traces and rewire?
This is done for adapting generic 30 pins simms for few certain IBM
machines.
To clarify: He's making an adapter for plugging 72-pin SIMMs into a 64-pin
socket.
> >While the connector may be the same, I'm
sceptical that they are
> >compatible; a few years ago I tried an AST 64-pin SIMM in my GVP card
> >unsuccessfully.
>
> What are those AST SIMMs used for anyway?
AST machines and queer machines that use 64pin simms!
I have bunch
of those little 64pin 1MB and rare few 4MB usually comes out of AST
486 bravo series cpu on a card types.
Hmm, I've got a 486 Bravo, but it uses 72-pinners. Still, it's a queer
machine. So far, no non-MS OS has worked on it.
1. The # of chips on both 64pin and 72pin are same
therefore 32bit
per stick plus 1bit every byte of data for parity = 9 or 18, non
parity 8 or 16 chips, except for some early 12 chip parity simms.
How's the pinout?
AST is bad as Compaq using oddball memory modules in
all shapes on
many early to mid 90's compaq machines.
Bastards.
IBM is not *that* bad like this, 99% of time these
machines they
produced since the ps/2 series used standard types except 25/30
series (except make it work by this hack noted above) and few early
to mid 90's used either standard or ECC in same machines. I'm not
including those RS6000 series which is totally different animal to
this topic.
Don't get me started on PS/2s. I collect them, but they are nightmares to get
going. The actual reason I started collecting them was that I found one in a
dumpster and found nout that not a single part could be reused in another
machine.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6.
Goto: A programming tool that exists to allow structured programmers to
complain about unstructured programmers.