On Jan 6 2005, 12:05, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Steve Thatcher wrote:
> the only reason Microsoft would not add binary transfer capability
as an
> integral part of early DOS is that the people
that needed it were
in a
> small minority. It made no business sense to
include features that
they
> believed that most people really didn't need.
Later in DOS, they
did
What? It seems to me they had to do more programming work to prevent
binary copying to the serial port.
No, actually much less. To make binary transfers work, they'd have had
to change the already-existing methods that they had. To prevent them,
they only had to add an error message and add one more case to a test
for a command-line switch.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York