19 Aug
2010
19 Aug
'10
2:44 p.m.
At 03:59 PM 7/24/2010, Liam Proven wrote:
The next jump will be more interesting: 32-bit OSs
basically can't
usefully handle >4GB of RAM, nor can the main ones handle >2GB drives.
Both are becoming common.
Sure you meant "terabyte" not "gigabyte". The 2 TB drives are
certainly
more popular and common because they're getting close to $100.
- John
19 Aug
19 Aug
6:21 p.m.
On 19 August 2010 15:44, John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
At 03:59 PM 7/24/2010, Liam Proven wrote:
Blimey, that was a month ago!
But yes, you're right, I meant TB not GB in the latter case.
--
Liam Proven ? Info & profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/lproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AIM/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven ? MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? ICQ: 73187508
The next jump will be more interesting: 32-bit OSs
basically can't
usefully handle >4GB of RAM, nor can the main ones handle >2GB drives.
Both are becoming common.
Sure you meant "terabyte" not "gigabyte". ?The 2 TB drives are
certainly
more popular and common because they're getting close to $100.
5256
days inactive
5256
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
jfoust＠threedee.com -
lproven＠gmail.com