>
It may be, but CdS cells abound, and I don't see them going away
> anytime soon. There's so little cadmium in them that I really don't see
> it ever being a problem.
You and I know it's not a problem,. but that is
hargly going to satisfy
the non-scientific idiots we have in charge. I beleive that all CdS LDRs
are not RoHS compliant ;-(. This doesn;'t affect home constructios (at
least not in the UK), it does matter if you're going to use them commerially.
CdS cells have quite a few problems that have made them obsolete for
I don;t disagree that there are other devices that have advantages in
many applciaitons, and it's entirely reasonable to then use said other
devices. But thee CdS photoresisto also has an advantage -- it's a
resistor. At a constnat ligjht level, the I-V characteristic is pretty
darn lienar. That makes it ideal for the sort of amplitude-control
application that we've been discussisng
photographic purposes: temperature dependence, slow
response and memory
effect. They need a significant time to adjust to a different level of
illumination to give a normal response. The response becoming non-linear
with age has also been reported. For a long time cameras have been using
silicon photodiodes instead.
Some also use GaAs and related photodiodes...
I think i cna see cameras with photovoltaic selenium cells, CdS
photoresisotrs and silicon photodiodes without geting up...
-tony