Not to beat a dead horse, but I believe Tim's question was relevant. I
read about optical storage using holography well over ten years ago
but am unaware of its present use or status. This may not strictly
qualify as classic computer subject matter but shouldn't we give a 12
year-old a break? Tim should be commended and encouraged for his
interest in computer science and preservation, not hen-pecked over the
fact that he related his question to a Star Trak episode.
Keep asking questions Tim and don't let anybody intimidate you into
silence.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/10/98 2:09 PM
Star Trek is a television show.
Do you really think that this question is appropriate?
Two words... alt.startrek
van
Sorry, but this has been bugging me for quite some
time. In Star Trek, they
use "Isolinear" based memory circuts to store information in both the short
and long term. So, from the looks of it, it's some kind of crystal, and can
transmit it's data very quickly, and with no moving parts, so I'm guessing
that it's similiar to today's RAM. Now, for the hard part: It can hold
entire encyclopedia's in tiny amounts. In one episiode, they had nanites,
little robot-bugs that could hold "gigabytes of information," and were
microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the data
intact.
Was crystaline storage ever attempted like this? Is it possible?
Feasable?
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
.........................................................................
@
/
/ Shift Lever
(D)/
\===================================== @ ================ Floor Plan ===
BNL |- - -Phase Shifter- - - -|--/ Get Wired!
- ------------]=[]@----------------------@ 415.276.4979
Trans- ] ]](A) Toll Free 1.888.208.6655 (B) ? (C) Rear Connection
mission ]]]]]]]]]]]]Driveshaft]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
] ]]
71 ------------] web superstation of the stars...
van burnham
http://www.futuraworld.com
production manager
wired 520 third street fourth floor san francisco ca 94107 united states
.........................................................................
for immediate emergency wireless access send email to van-page(a)wired.com
van(a)wired.com van(a)futuraworld.com pingpong(a)spy.net vanburnham(a)aol.com
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from
lists2.u.washington.edu by
smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr10.140909.1767.36428; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 14:09:15 -0400
Received: from host (
lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by
lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id LAA18051; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:03:44 -0700
Received: from
mxu3.u.washington.edu (
mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by
lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id LAA63546 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>du>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998
11:03:35 -0700
Received: from
wired.com (
get.wired.com [204.62.131.5])
by
mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id LAA04060 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>du>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:03:34
-0700
Received: from [206.221.206.170] (
wrs.wired.com [206.221.206.170])
by
wired.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA15918
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>du>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:01:03 -0700
Message-Id: <v03110700b1540e831ecb(a)[206.221.206.170]>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:14:44 -0700
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Van Burnham <van(a)wired.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
In-Reply-To: <001001bd64a0$934d3ee0$3167bcc1@hotze>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: van(a)pophost.wired.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN