7 Mar
2005
7 Mar
'05
8:31 p.m.
I'd be interested- couldn't start 'till we spring the kids for summer break,
though.
- Scott Quinn
7 Mar
7 Mar
9:34 p.m.
Saquinn624 at aol.com wrote:
I'd be interested- couldn't start 'till we
spring the kids for summer break,
though.
- Scott Quinn
<URL: http://www.jaywalk.co.uk/pdp8/vhdl/ > Google for "PDP8
VHDL".
There's lots of hits.
--jc
8 Mar
8 Mar
6:51 p.m.
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:51 -0500
"J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
Saquinn624 at aol.com wrote:
Yes, but there's already a nice CMOS chip out there, in a friendly
40-pin DIP package. It's even more than a decade on-topic here. (the
date code on the ones I have is 8001).
(googling 'IM6100' probably doesn't bring up as many snazzy websites,
though)
I'd be interested- couldn't start
'till we spring the kids for summer
break, though.
- Scott Quinn
<URL: http://www.jaywalk.co.uk/pdp8/vhdl/ > Google for "PDP8
VHDL".
There's lots of hits.
9:22 p.m.
Scott Stevens wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:51 -0500
"J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
Yes, but there's already a nice CMOS chip out there, in a friendly
40-pin DIP package. It's even more than a decade on-topic here. (the
date code on the ones I have is 8001).
(googling 'IM6100' probably doesn't bring up as many snazzy websites,
though)
Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too... 'Dark room timer'
9:38 p.m.
I did not write what was quoted below as being from me. I think a
couple paragraphs got dropped or something. I don't have the original
article that shows who it should be correctly attributed to.
--jc
woodelf wrote:
Scott Stevens wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:51 -0500
"J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
Yes, but there's already a nice CMOS chip out there, in a friendly
40-pin DIP package. It's even more than a decade on-topic here. (the
date code on the ones I have is 8001).
(googling 'IM6100' probably doesn't bring up as many snazzy websites,
though)
Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too... 'Dark room timer'
9 Mar
9 Mar
5:47 p.m.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:38:19 -0500
"J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
I did not write what was quoted below as being from
me. I think a
couple paragraphs got dropped or something. I don't have the original
article that shows who it should be correctly attributed to.
--jc
Somehow it looks like attribution, and your comment in the thread, got
snipped out of the response from woodelf. Your 'part' in the thread
was:
----
<URL= http://www.jaywalk.co.uk/pdp8/vhdl/> Google for "PDP8 VHDL".
There's lots of hits.
---
I was able to reach back to the original article only because I'v found
a great email client (sylpheed) that threads the discussions here. I'd
be lost without it.
woodelf wrote:
> Scott Stevens wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:51 -0500
>> "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, but there's already a nice CMOS chip out there, in a friendly
>> 40-pin DIP package. It's even more than a decade on-topic here.
>(the> date code on the ones I have is 8001).
>>
>> (googling 'IM6100' probably doesn't bring up as many snazzy
>websites,> though)
>>
>>
> Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too... 'Dark room timer'
>
>> http://artm-friends.at/rm/foto/duka.html
>
6:18 p.m.
New subject: (Scott's post) trimmimg
Scott Stevens wrote:
Somehow it looks like attribution, and your comment in
the thread, got
snipped out of the response from woodelf. Your 'part' in the thread
was:
To JC:
Well I trim posts amd respond to the whole message. While you may not
have said
that you did send it and I feel free to reply to all parts of the message.
well
I was able to reach back to the original article only because I'v found
a great email client (sylpheed) that threads the discussions here. I'd
be lost without it.
I just got stupid mozilla for mail, it wants to fomat in HTML ,
convert smilies to graphics,
messup '>' for replies *BUT* not let you follow threads.
Ben alias woodelf
8 Mar
8 Mar
10:32 p.m.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:22:35 -0700, woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too... 'Dark
room timer'
> http://artm-friends.at/rm/foto/duka.html
Is that an Intercept Jr? Sure looks like it. Handy that LEDs don't
fog paper. :-)
It reminds me of an article I saw, with software, for hanging a relay
off of the Q-line of an 1802 on an original PopTronics Elf for use as
an enlarger timer. You set the time on the toggles, fired up the CPU,
and used the IN button to fire the enlarger for a preset number of
seconds.
Given how much enlarger timers were 30 years ago, this was an
effective use of a $100 computer. Kinda still is.
-ethan
9 Mar
9 Mar
4:09 a.m.
Hi,
Ethan Dicks said:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:22:35 -0700, woodelf
<bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
They _were_ expensive back then, being a hardware type I built my own
about 25 years ago. It divided the 50Hz mains frequency down to 1 Hz
and fed that to a pair of bcd counters with the count set by thumb-wheel
switches (with a red led to illuminate them...). It's still in use
controlling my Americam-made Omega emlarger of the same vintage.
--
Cheers,
Stan Barr stanb at dial.pipex.com
The future was never like this!
Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too...
'Dark room timer'
> http://artm-friends.at/rm/foto/duka.html
Is that an Intercept Jr? Sure looks like it. Handy that LEDs don't
fog paper. :-)
It reminds me of an article I saw, with software, for hanging a relay
off of the Q-line of an 1802 on an original PopTronics Elf for use as
an enlarger timer. You set the time on the toggles, fired up the CPU,
and used the IN button to fire the enlarger for a preset number of
seconds.
Given how much enlarger timers were 30 years ago, this was an
effective use of a $100 computer. Kinda still is.
5:42 p.m.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:22:35 -0700
woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
Scott Stevens wrote:
Cool. I have a friend like that. I believe he's using a TRS-80 Model
100 as a controller in his darkroom.
-Scott
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:51 -0500
"J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> wrote:
Yes, but there's already a nice CMOS chip out there, in a friendly
40-pin DIP package. It's even more than a decade on-topic here.
(the date code on the ones I have is 8001).
(googling 'IM6100' probably doesn't bring up as many snazzy websites,
though)
Well this looks snazzy ... On topic too... 'Dark room timer'
7071
days inactive
7072
days old
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
bfranchuk＠jetnet.ab.ca -
chenmel＠earthlink.net -
ethan.dicks＠gmail.com -
jcwren＠jcwren.com -
Saquinn624＠aol.com -
stanb＠dial.pipex.com