Michael Holley wrote:
I finished my Nixie tube clock. (My first try at
this was around 1971.)
http://www.swtpc.com/mholley/PopularElectronics/Dec1970/PE_Dec1970.htm
I could not figure out how to wire the tens of hours module to
the hours
module. The magazine article was very vague and
even misleading
about that.
> So one night I sent an email to Gary Kay, the designer, and the next
> morning I had a response. How is that for tech support 35 years after
> the fact?
And woodelf replied:
Grumble Grumble Grumble ... Gripe Gripe Gripe.
I would have updated the high voltage power supply to a simple
transistor regulator. I have about 128 AC around here and that
can really give over voltage on 115 V transformers.
PS. Where do you find a 300 V transformer ... I may build one
some day. Also any options for a ALARM feature? Say a analog
bird chipring sound?
I keep drooling over SWTPC products...
I wish that made it big
rather than PC's.
> Michael Holley
<LURK OFF>
Grumble Grumble Grumble ... Gripe Gripe Gripe. WTF?
Michael has put a lot of time and effort into documenting the
history, people and products of SWTPC. Gary Kay was a brilliant
SWTPC engineer and the fact that he recently corresponded with MH
and facilitated MH's successful construction of the digital clock,
IMHO, was the point of the post. If you read the PE article you
would have seen that an alarm feature and means of implementation
was described.
I would have updated the high voltage power supply to
a simple
transistor regulator. I have about 128 AC around here and that
can really give over voltage on 115 V transformers.
Again, WTF? The recreation is as close to the original design
as possible. Transistor regulator? I'm sure the nixies can
handle any 128 VAC generated "over voltage" condition that may
be inherent in the original design. BTW, is that 128 VAC your
actual _RMS_ AC voltage? d8^)
PS. Where do you find a 300 V transformer ... I may
build one
some day.
P.S. You'll build a 300 V transformer someday? d8^), again.
</LURK OFF>
Bill