14 Oct
2016
14 Oct
'16
6:42 p.m.
Came across this in the local craigslist today:
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/sop/5820161303.html
I don't know if this is of interest to the Big Iron IBM guys, but if
there's any interest from folks not in the Seattle Area, I'm happy to
help faciliate.
--Jason
14 Oct
14 Oct
6:48 p.m.
On 2016-10-14 7:42 PM, Jason Howe wrote:
Came across this in the local craigslist today:
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/sop/5820161303.html
I don't know if this is of interest to the Big Iron IBM guys, but if
there's any interest from folks not in the Seattle Area, I'm happy to
help faciliate.
--Jason
That is a 62PC I don't know of any 370 systems that used them, I think
the closed they came to a mainframe was they where used in the 8130 and
8140 systems. There was also at least one in every S/38, in the later
days of S/38 it was usually only one with the system microcode on it and
it was run isolated from the rest of the disk storage because of their
tendency to die suddenly. I believe that 62PCs where also used in S/34
and Series/1.
Paul.
7:03 p.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Berger
Sent: 14 October 2016 23:49
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: IBM 370 Hard Drive
On 2016-10-14 7:42 PM, Jason Howe wrote:
days of
Came across this in the local craigslist today:
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/sop/5820161303.html
I don't know if this is of interest to the Big Iron IBM guys, but if
there's any interest from folks not in the Seattle Area, I'm happy to
help faciliate.
--Jason
That is a 62PC I don't know of any 370 systems that used them, I think
the
closed they came to a mainframe was they where used in the 8130 and
8140 systems. There was also at least one in every S/38, in the later S/38 it was usually only one with the system microcode
on it and it was
run
isolated from the rest of the disk storage because of
their tendency to
die
suddenly. I believe that 62PCs where also used in
S/34 and Series/1.
Paul.
I was going to say it didn't look like any S/370 drive I had seen. Its also
only the Head and Disk assembly (HAD) and if the spindle has been turned and
who wouldn't turn the spindle, its probably toast. It would make a nice
museum exhibit, provided it was donated, but I think $185 is optimistic...]
Dave
G4UGM
10:32 p.m.
On 10/14/2016 04:03 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
Interesting. I know nothing about older IBM stuff other than people say
that it's a little hard to come by, hence why I relayed the find to the
list -- just in case it was worth it.
--Jason
-----Original
Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Berger
Sent: 14 October 2016 23:49
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: IBM 370 Hard Drive
On 2016-10-14 7:42 PM, Jason Howe wrote:
days of
Came across this in the local craigslist today:
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/sop/5820161303.html
I don't know if this is of interest to the Big Iron IBM guys, but if
there's any interest from folks not in the Seattle Area, I'm happy to
help faciliate.
--Jason
That is a 62PC I don't know of any 370 systems that used them, I think
the
closed they came to a mainframe was they where used in the 8130 and
8140 systems. There was also at least one in every S/38, in the later S/38 it was usually only one with the system
microcode on it and it was
run
isolated from the rest of the disk storage
because of their tendency to
die
suddenly. I believe that 62PCs where also used
in S/34 and Series/1.
Paul.
I was going to say it didn't look like any S/370 drive I had seen. Its
also
only the Head and Disk assembly (HAD) and if the spindle has been turned and
who wouldn't turn the spindle, its probably toast. It would make a nice
museum exhibit, provided it was donated, but I think $185 is optimistic...]
Dave
G4UGM
15 Oct
15 Oct
3:37 a.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jason
Howe
Sent: 15 October 2016 03:32
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: IBM 370 Hard Drive
On 10/14/2016 04:03 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
Interesting. I know nothing about older IBM stuff other than people say
that
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Berger
Sent: 14 October 2016 23:49
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: IBM 370 Hard Drive
On 2016-10-14 7:42 PM, Jason Howe wrote:
days of
Came across this in the local craigslist today:
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/sop/5820161303.html
I don't know if this is of interest to the Big Iron IBM guys, but if
there's any interest from folks not in the Seattle Area, I'm happy
to help faciliate.
--Jason
That is a 62PC I don't know of any 370 systems that used them, I
think the closed they came to a mainframe was they where used in the
8130 and
8140 systems. There was also at least one in every S/38, in the
later S/38 it was usually only one with the system
microcode on it and it
was
run
isolated from the rest of the disk storage
because of their tendency
to
die
suddenly. I believe that 62PCs where also used
in S/34 and Series/1.
Paul.
I was going to say it didn't look like any S/370 drive I had seen. Its
also only the Head and Disk assembly (HAD) and if the spindle has been
turned and who wouldn't turn the spindle, its probably toast. It would
make a nice museum exhibit, provided it was donated, but I think $185
is optimistic...]
Dave
G4UGM
it's a little hard to come by, hence why I relayed
the find to the list --
just in
case it was worth it.
--Jason
Jason,
Should have said thanks. It is interesting to see such items, and its also
nice to remember that in the 370 days IBM made many systems, not just 370.
Some of this was fall out from the "abandoned" "Future Systems"
project but
it was also coupled with the Anti-Trust legislation. I was told by an IBM'er
that IBM was
Worried it would be split in two, and as such had engineered the product
line such that in this event, both halves would have kit to sell that they
could make themselves.
So while System/3 and System/36 could use some S/370 peripherals they had a
complete range of different devices, such as twin-ax terminals. Weird...
In the event it didn't happen and IBM was left with multiple incompatible
designs...
Dave
2871
days inactive
2872
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
dave.g4ugm＠gmail.com -
jason＠smbfc.net -
phb.hfx＠gmail.com