Subject: Re: CompuPro floppy controller differences
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:42:29 +0100 (BST)
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Are they
really that common in the States? They are not at all common in
the UK any more, so don't think of that as being a source for 50Hz pulleys...
If you were her than 50hz pulleys are a non issue. ;)
Sure, but if anyone was mad enough to bring their collection across to
England, they would not be able to find the right pulleys...
Lifes rough. The solution I used once for a 50hz and later a 400hz motor
was a simple transformer output pushpull amp fed with a wein bridge osc,
Sure.
I am told (and probably have the service sheet for) there was an AC/DC
mains radiogram sold in the UK that had an AC motor for the record
turntable. There was a unit, only used on DC mains, that consisted of 3
valves, acting as an oscillator and push-pull output (the last 2 valves
were probably 50L6s.). Of course there was no HT rectifier, since it was
only used on DC mains (The radio/amplifier section was the normal
series-string heaters and half-wave rectifier type of thing).
Not the same thing though may be the same idea. What I have is a unit I
designed as a variable frequency power source (115-125VAC) self contained
that runs off line power (has own PS) and run AC motors to 100W in the
range of 25-500hz. Very handy for older audio tape decks that are
slightly off speed or if you slew the tape while hearing it (off speed).
Mine is a proto I built 30 years ago and the production version was used
to run a 3M 1" 8track commercial deck for studio use. Many of the multitrack
decks had DC motor contros but not all. That variation allowed for a
computer interface to alter speed off spec to find and sync timecodes on
the tape. The controller also managed the deck for FF, forward, rewind,
speed select and stop. Very impressive to see two decks running 14 tracks
of music and this would sync both perfectly or offset as desired
(for effects). That system used sinewave drive to keep noise out of
the system as we found square waves worked fine but the amps and all
tended to hear it.. and harmonics of it.
I also have a smaller version that runs from 12V battery for smaller
motors to 30watts. Most motors tolerate a squware wave source so
efficientcy can be very high. The trick of running AC motors off
variable frequency also is used for my antenna rotator (ham radio) so
I can make large changes in azmuth with acceleration and deceleration
as most rotator are AC motors and the antennas have some interta
(15 and 18 foot booms). This also has a microcontroller (8749) to
manage the position and motor controls.
Doing it with a solidstate converter is far more efficient than motor
driven alternators for frequency conversion at low power. Much quieter
too. I've since seen the same thing for done for large (10hp and up)
motor controller.
The whole show comes from the days of doing audio consoles both analog
and early digital.
Obviously the method could also produce 230V AC if desired. So 50hz pulleys,
no problem!
Allison