Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
Subject: Re: S100 archive?
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, M H Stein wrote:
> I wouldn't call a scan or photocopy of a
manual "intellectual property."
I'd be interested in hearing more of your
definition of "intellectual
property". It seems to be different from that used by the USA legal
system, in which a copyrighted manual IS an embodiment of intellectual
property, as is any reproduction, particularly scan or photocopy.
------
My point exactly; a manual, and especially a scan or copy are the
embodiment, not the IP itself; I think you'd have trouble copyrighting
a copy of a copyrighted work.
We were talking about "attribution;" if I were to quote one of Mark Twain's
many witticisms it would still be attributed to him, not me.
So "attribution" of a copy to one of several other copies of the same thing
seems rather meaningless except as a matter of courtesy and I don't
understand why some people seem to think it's useful and important
information.
But, having said that, you're absolutely right: the purpose of the Internet
these days is indeed largely "the free sharing and exchange of other
people's intellectual property," and a large part of that IP is specifically
meant to be shared and exchanged.
m