Nope! No need for a lengthy standards tirade. Eric's right . . . I was
actually thinking of the RS449 rather than 422.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: RS-422 gender benders
> "Richard Erlacher"
<richard(a)idcomm.com> wrote:
> > It's been at least 10 years since my last look at RS422, bit IIRC,
there
> > were two connectors involved in that spec.
There was a DC37 of one
geneder
> > or another, and there was, I believe, a DA15
as well, which was the
one with
> > the differential high-rate signals on it.
Does that sound reasonable
to
> > anyone. I know most applications use(d) a
subset of this standard but
> > referred to it as RS-422 only because they used the 5volt differential
> > signalling-copmpatible drivers, e.g. 26LS32/33, MC3486/87, etc.
>
> I think you might be talking about RS-449. AFAIK, RS-422 is ONLY an
> electrical specification, and does not recommend a connector. IIRC,
> RS-449 specifies a connector and the use of RS-422 electrical
interfaces.
And then there's RS-485, which is multi-drop (party line) RS-422. No
connector spec for this one either.
AAAAAAA! Okay, okay, okay, Mac mini-DIN female-female! (lest I precipitate
a standards discussion ... :-)
--
----------------------------- personal page:
http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University *
ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- The steady state of disks is full. -- Ken
Thompson -------------------------