Nope!  No need for a lengthy standards tirade.  Eric's right . . . I was
actually thinking of the RS449 rather than 422.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: RS-422 gender benders
  > "Richard Erlacher"
<richard(a)idcomm.com> wrote:
 > > It's been at least 10 years since my last look at RS422, bit IIRC,
there
  > > were two connectors involved in that spec.
There was a DC37 of one 
geneder
  > > or another, and there was, I believe, a DA15
as well, which was the 
one with
  > > the differential high-rate signals on it.
Does that sound reasonable 
to
  > > anyone.  I know most applications use(d) a
subset of this standard but
 > > referred to it as RS-422 only because they used the 5volt differential
 > > signalling-copmpatible drivers, e.g. 26LS32/33, MC3486/87, etc.
 >
 > I think you might be talking about RS-449.  AFAIK, RS-422 is ONLY an
 > electrical specification, and does not recommend a connector.  IIRC,
 > RS-449 specifies a connector and the use of RS-422 electrical 
interfaces.
 
 And then there's RS-485, which is multi-drop (party line) RS-422.  No
 connector spec for this one either. 
 AAAAAAA! Okay, okay, okay, Mac mini-DIN female-female! (lest I precipitate
 a standards discussion ... :-)
 --
 ----------------------------- personal page: 
 http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
   Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University *
ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
  -- The steady state of disks is full. -- Ken
Thompson -------------------------