14 Sep
2002
14 Sep
'02
12:50 p.m.
I saw a Mac at a thrift today that I assume must be one of the 128k
Macs. It is a Model M0001 and there is not a mini-DIN to be found
on it. Just D-subs and an RJ-11 on the front for the keyboard. It
runs too - or it would like to if it had a disk.
Is my 128k Mac surmise correct?
- don
14 Sep
14 Sep
1:17 p.m.
Don,
If the nameplate on the back says "Macintosh" and nothing else, it is
the original 128K Mac.
I'm pretty sure the M0001 designation was used exclusively for that
model and that the Macintosh 128K which shipped concurrently with the
Macintosh 512K had a different number.
Erik
www.vintage-computer.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-admin(a)classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Don Maslin
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 2:51 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Early Mac
I saw a Mac at a thrift today that I assume must be one of the 128k
Macs. It is a Model M0001 and there is not a mini-DIN to be found
on it. Just D-subs and an RJ-11 on the front for the keyboard. It
runs too - or it would like to if it had a disk.
Is my 128k Mac surmise correct?
- don
3:30 p.m.
On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Don Maslin wrote:
Macs. It is a Model M0001 and there is not a mini-DIN
to be found on it.
Just D-subs and an RJ-11 on the front for the keyboard. It runs too - or
it would like to if it had a disk.
Is my 128k Mac surmise correct?
If it has no badge on the backside that has "Macintosh 128K" or "Macintosh
512K" then it is indeed an original Mac.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
15 Sep
15 Sep
1:21 a.m.
If it has no badge on the backside that has
"Macintosh 128K" or
"Macintosh 512K" then it is indeed an original Mac.
Not necessarily. Many (all?) original 128Ks that were upgraded to 512K
or 512Ke (512K with 128K Mac Plus ROM, vs. original 64K ROM) still had
the original nameplate.
9:05 a.m.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
True, I hadn't considered that.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
If it has no
badge on the backside that has "Macintosh 128K" or
"Macintosh 512K" then it is indeed an original Mac.
Not necessarily. Many (all?) original 128Ks that were upgraded to 512K
or 512Ke (512K with 128K Mac Plus ROM, vs. original 64K ROM) still had
the original nameplate.
7959
days inactive
7960
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
classiccmp＠vintage-computer.com -
donm＠cts.com -
eric＠brouhaha.com -
foo＠siconic.com