7090 and 7094 are discrete transistors, not tubes.
709 is tubes.
All three exist in collections, I think, though maybe not in running condition
Google will help out find them.
Jon Elson <elson at pico-systems.com> wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:43:31 -0700
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: IBM 7090 mainframe!
Message-ID: <50165743.1836.50913E at cclist.sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On 28 Jul 2012 at 14:51, Peter Van Peborgh wrote:
Does
anyone know (of) anyone running/restoring an IBM 7090, early 60s
vintage? I am about to clear out a friend's collection of vintage
computer bits and I may find relevant modules and documentation, h/w
and s/w.
I think a real find would be a can of 7090 core oil.
Wow, I think any of this gear would be very unlikely to have been saved.
I know Washington University had some SAGE pieces in a warehouse, but I
haven't
seen any 7090-vintage stuff in ANY museum collection. It is kind of a big
hole in their collections. The tube stuff all went in the dumpster as
soon as
transistor and core memory came in, and the early transistor machines had
an even shorter life than most computer generations. Hmmmm, now that I
think of it, I think WU also had a 7094 memory unit - all tubes, kind of
in the transition between tube and transistor. I remember it because an
address wire had burned up and somebody had threaded a wire through
all the burned places to get it running again. A horrible kluge job, too.
Hmm, that one was not oil-cooled, but maybe the damage I saw was
WHY they went to oil cooling.
Jon