My interpretation is: tough noogies.
Your opinion is noted, ignorant as it is, based on assumptions, incomplete
facts, and a callous disregard for and improper understanding of property
rights (that apply equally in Canada as well as here in America, ancient
law that goes back to the Magna Charta).
I understand there are people like you, who will look at a situation like
this and say stuff like, "tough noogies"(?) I realize you would probably
say the same thing to your grandmother--damn the facts. You're the same
type of people who believe it's OK to scam someone out of their property
by intentionally withholding court notices they are required to send, then
collude to deprive the rightful owner of any possible remedy because you
know you have an insider in the court who will make everything work in
your favor.
I'm not concerned with people like you, inasmuch as I can avoid doing any
business with you so that when things don't work out I can be guaranteed
my rights will be observed and a business relationship can be wound down
honorably and with integrity.
--
Sellam Ismail VintageTech
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintagetech.com
Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap...The truth is always simple.