On 19 Jan 2007 at 14:11, Billy Pettit wrote:
Sorry, but I never worked on it. Saw it in action a
few times and was
fascinated with the picker arm moving so fast over the honeycomb.
Same here. "Beer cans in a pigeon coop". I was told by the fellow
showing it off that it was better than the IBM version because it
used hydraulics for the picker arm. I was told by the same person
that the double arms on the IBM unit were there because they tended
to fail often, so the unit could limp along with only one.
Don't know if that was true or not.
Cheers,
Chuck