21 Feb
2002
21 Feb
'02
1:18 a.m.
And 12:11 11/11 1121, etc.
And 22:12 21/12, 2122, etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Merchberger [mailto:zmerch@30below.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:51 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: Once in a Lifetime, Twice in Forever
Rumor has it that Joe may have mentioned these words:
[snip]
The last time there was such a symmetrical pattern was long before the days
of the digital watch and the 24-hour clock - at 10.01am on January 10,
1001.
What about 11:11 11/11 1111?
And because the clock only goes up to 23.59, it is
something that
will never happen again.
Bzzzt. Wrong again. What about:
21:12, 21/12, 2112???
<snip>
21 Feb
21 Feb
1:31 a.m.
And thusly Feldman, Robert spake:
And 12:11 11/11 1121, etc.
And 22:12 21/12, 2122, etc.
But those ones aren't as _special_.... They aren't *triple* palindromes.
Cheers,
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Merchberger [mailto:zmerch@30below.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:51 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: Once in a Lifetime, Twice in Forever
Rumor has it that Joe may have mentioned these words:
[snip]
The last time there was such a symmetrical pattern was long before the days
of the digital watch and the 24-hour clock - at 10.01am on January 10,
1001.
What about 11:11 11/11 1111?
And because the clock only goes up to 23.59, it
is something that
will never happen again.
Bzzzt. Wrong again. What about:
21:12, 21/12, 2112???
<snip>
8341
days inactive
8341
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
bpope＠wordstock.com -
Robert_Feldman＠jdedwards.com