In a message dated 1/17/2002 6:38:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
lgwalker(a)mts.net writes:
<< > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
> > >
> > > > Right, I didn't even think about the ISA machines. I've seen
so
many of
> > > > the microchannel systems that I
often forget about the others. As I
> > > > think about it, I might actually have several model 25s instead of
50s.
> > > > Guess I'll find out once I
uncover them.
> > >
> > > It's hard to confuse them. The 25 is an all-in-one. The easier
ones to
confuse are
the 30 and the 55SX, as they came in the same case.
Model 40 and below are ISA, 50 series and above are microchannel. The
30-286 and 55SX used the same case but the 30 (8086) had a similar but
plastic beige/brown (as opposed to all beige steel) case.
Well, at least I've got a general idea what I've got stored away now. I
may have to go unbury them tonight, just to satisfy my curiosity.
I uncovered the stack of machines. All of them are in fair to good
condition, but missing their hard drives. They seem to be intact
otherwise.
2 - Model 55SX (8555)
1 - Model 30 286 (8530)
1 - Model 30 (8530)
1 - Model 50 (8550)
Does anyone know why IBM choose to use the same part number for the Model
30 and Model 30 286?
-Toth
: Do you mean the SN # ? Don't have a 30 286 to check but most
:IBMs had a model subset that better described it like the 8580-111
:8580-Axx or in the PS/1s for example the 2133-011. Mueller has
:most listed in his 3rd edition but not the SN #s. >>
All PS/2 models start with 85 or 95 for the model number. Serial numbers
starting with 23 were built in RTP, NC. numbers starting with 78 were born in
Greenock, I think.
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum
www.nothingtodo.org