From: Raymond Moyers <rmoyers(a)nop.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Tape dumping programs for Unix/Linux...
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:37:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200205021718.g42HI9X7086853(a)daemonweed.reanimators.org>
On Thursday 02 May 2002 12:18, you wrote:
Whats
wrong with cat ?
What's wrong with cat (and dd, and arguably the whole Un*x concept of
files-as-bytestreams for that matter) is that it loses information. A
magnetic tape is not an ordered stream of bytes, it is an ordered
stream of files of records, and each record has a length.
Here you are talking about a data tape with fields that make up records
where the records are all the same size and the fields being varaible
length inside the record but repeating in all the other records.
But a tape like this, from the days when tapes was used as random
access devices is not the format of a system archive tape is it ?
So you are forced to result to multiple disk
files to maintain the file
structure.
(which adds to your hassle because now you need to manage collections
of files instead of a single tape),
Like with a tarball ?
and as you are copying the files to bytestreams
you lose the record
length information.
Unless you are going to resurrect some old general ledger program
why is this important ?
For the same reason it is important to resurrect old computer hardware.
I thought that would be obvious to people who read this mailing list.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu