Many LCDs will slow scan. That said, the Amigas natively run at super-slow scanrates. Likely you will either find most LCDs work or no LCD works (without the sync-strainer, scan-doubler, etc.). I don't have an LCD at home so I haven't tested any. -- Eric

On Fri, 28 May 2010, Brian Lanning wrote: While not an LCD TV, I've heard good things about this device when used with a C-64: http://onlinestore.rtv-veg.com/vt1200.html g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me-109F/X Project ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_!

On May 28, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Brian Lanning <brianlanning at gmail.com> wrote: Honestly, it's been my experience that the scan converters in most LCD/Plasma sets do a pretty poor job for most older computers and video game systems. I get terrible blurring on motion and incorrect de-interlacing, processing lag (does make a difference for games) and other ugly looking effects with the one in my set. Even through s- video, things aren't much better. I finally bit the bullet and bought an XRGB3; it's a scan converter with mutiple Composite, s-video, component, VGA, and Japanese SCART input, meant for use with video game systems. It has a VGA/dvi output. Tons of options, low processing lag, and does a *great* job picture-wise, even with composite inputs (though if you can get an s- video or RGB signal from your devices it's preferable.). Went from a blurry washed out picture from my Sega Genesis and c64 to seeing each glorious pixel in exquisite detail :). (you can even turn on a scanline simulation mode if you want it to look more like a CRT...) Downsides are that it cost me about $350, and the menus are in Japanese (translations are available on the web). If you have the means, I highly recommend it. Josh