30 Jan
2004
30 Jan
'04
11:03 p.m.
On Jan 30, 18:43, Zane H. Healy wrote:
Personally the systems I'd like to get Softwindows
running on would
be
either my SGI O2 R12k/270, or a OpenVMS system :^)
Don't bother. It's like treacle, and it won't run any recent version
of Windows. SoftWindows 4.0 is faster than 5.0, but I think it
emulates a 486, so it won't run pentium-specific code.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
30 Jan
30 Jan
11:25 p.m.
On Jan 31, 2004, at 4:03 AM, Pete Turnbull wrote:
On Jan 30, 18:43, Zane H. Healy wrote:
I just saw a post on one of the NeXT newsgroups that a guy had
NeXTSTEP v3.3 Intel running in Bosch. I'm guessing that Windows would
be simpler, since that's likely what most of the Bosch team will be
testing with.
Doc
Personally the systems I'd like to get
Softwindows running on would
be
either my SGI O2 R12k/270, or a OpenVMS system
:^)
Don't bother. It's like treacle, and it won't run any recent version
of Windows. SoftWindows 4.0 is faster than 5.0, but I think it
emulates a 486, so it won't run pentium-specific code. 
31 Jan
31 Jan
2:50 a.m.
FWIW, If you want to spend money on the project, and have a Linux box
lying around.
VMware will remote display via a X connection (or at least it used to -
been a while since I did it. Confirm it with the demo.)
It gives you some keyboard grab warnings, and won't do full screen, but
it did work.
(And from what I remember of SW 4 off a SS5, its lots better.)
Bewarned, VMWare really likes their products, and charges accordingly.
:-(
David
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 05:25, Doc Shipley wrote:
On Jan 31, 2004, at 4:03 AM, Pete Turnbull wrote:
On Jan 30, 18:43, Zane H. Healy wrote:
I just saw a post on one of the NeXT newsgroups that a guy had
NeXTSTEP v3.3 Intel running in Bosch. I'm guessing that Windows would
be simpler, since that's likely what most of the Bosch team will be
testing with.
Doc Personally the systems I'd like to get
Softwindows running on would
be
either my SGI O2 R12k/270, or a OpenVMS system
:^)
Don't bother. It's like treacle, and it won't run any recent version
of Windows. SoftWindows 4.0 is faster than 5.0, but I think it
emulates a 486, so it won't run pentium-specific code.
4:44 a.m.
On Jan 31, 2004, at 7:50 AM, David Holland wrote:
FWIW, If you want to spend money on the project, and
have a Linux box
lying around.
VMware will remote display via a X connection (or at least it used to -
been a while since I did it. Confirm it with the demo.)
It gives you some keyboard grab warnings, and won't do full screen, but
it did work.
No full screen, because the X client isn't usually allowed to grab
the root window on the local display, and the only keyboard messages
you get anymore tell you how to release input.
(And from what I remember of SW 4 off a SS5, its lots
better.)
True fact.
Bewarned, VMWare really likes their products, and
charges accordingly.
:-(
Oh, I dunno. The copy of VMware I'm running here only cost about
$6500 US, not counting the MS licenses for the emulated Windows boxes.
That's not bad, right?
:^)
Doc
7478
days inactive
7478
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
dholland＠woh.rr.com -
doc＠mdrconsult.com -
pete＠dunnington.u-net.com