Ken Seefried wrote:
Ciro100 is definately one to avoid.
I won an auction from him, and he demanded that I leave positive
feedback for him before he would complete the deal. I finally agreed to
cancel the transaction to avoid him leaving a retaliatory negative.
Yikes, that's nasty..
When I'm buying, I usually leave feedback when the item arrives, then if I've
left a positive, I expect a positive in return.
When I'm selling, I tell the buyer to leave feedback if/when the item arrives,
or contact me if it doesn't arrive or arrives damaged. Once I get feedback
from the buyer, I leave feedback for them.
IMHO that's the best way to do it. To date I haven't had cause to leave
negative feedback for a seller, and I've had no problems with most of the
buyers I've dealt with. Had one moron decide to bid on one of my items then
disappeared - I started the "Payment Not Received" proceedings a week after
the auction ended, then NPB'd him after I hadn't heard back a week after that.
Sold the item to the next highest bidder, who paid about two hours after I
sent the second-chance offer through.
And I had one seller decide not to email me back when I bought his item - I
didn't bother leaving him any feedback at all (at the time, neutral feedback
wasn't an option). Oh, and one buyer who ignored the "I broke the item while
packing it, so I've refunded your payment" messages I sent him, and proceeded
to send payment a total of six times. Then after I refunded him for the sixth
time he left negative feedback for "not sending the item and refusing to
refund". I ended up contacting him with the dates and IDs of the transactions
I'd refunded, along with another note to ask why he'd negged me, then a couple
of hours later he retracted the neg...
--
Phil. | Kitsune: Acorn RiscPC SA202 64M+6G ViewFinder
philpem at
dsl.pipex.com | Cheetah: Athlon64 3200+ A8VDeluxeV2 512M+100G
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | Tiger: Toshiba SatPro4600 Celeron700 256M+40G