Roger Holmes wrote:
From: Brent Hilpert <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
My remaining concern might be that even with the new C bringing the
V up,
the regulation function of the supply may have been lost if the
transformer
is no longer functioning in the regions it was designed to.
Yes, but relays are unlikely to be damaged by a few volts too much.
Not a concern about damaging the relays, rather that the voltage may vary with
different load conditions (number of relays energised / state of the
machine). How consequential that issue is in this 'small' machine, I don't
know, but IBM did bother to provide it with a regulated supply, although that
could have been motivated by supply-side concerns.
My concern is the current in the intermediate winding
could damage
itself.
So far so good but I am charging a much larger capacitance for a
slightly longer period so I would think the current would be higher.
To get 48 volts I am going to have to add about another 6 uF, so about
48 F instead of 15, so very roughly three times the current, assuming
(and its a big assumption I can't justify), that the voltage is the
same.
The other thing that changes with f is the inductive impedance of all the
(other) windings of the transformer. Ferro-resonance transformers do not rely
only on the resonance principle, magnetic/inductive issues are also very
involved. I'm not at all convinced that simply changing the C is adapting the
supply for the new frequency (50 Hz). That you are having to go so far off the
theoretical new C would tend to support this.