SInce I sometimes take testing fairly seriously, I have several meters with
several slightly different diode testing modes. I've found none which
indicate a bad diode is good, nor do any of them indicate a good diode is
bad.
One of my testers is something I built for matching diodes, and and
transistors, and it runs a pretty constant 1.26 or 12.6 ma (from an LED
biasing a 2N3904) through a diode, and a panel meter displays the forward
voltage.
Not one of my meters exhibits behavior as described by "Wizard" however. I
can't imagine what the problem is, but I agree that digital meters can
produce unpredictable results when used in a way not intended by the
designers.
Generally speaking, the DMM is a Digital Panel Meter with a fixed reference
voltage built into it, looking a the output of an analog or even mechanical
switch, the purpose of which is to run the appropriate current through/into
the component under test to generate a voltage scaled to display a value
reflecting the value of the component under test. In the case of diode
test, that's really easy, since it's a current within a fairly forgiving
range, and which will, with most any diode produce a voltage reflecting what
that particular diode drops at that current. Almost all measurements can
easily be done in this way. Voltage is easiest, of course.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: sms(a)antinode.org <sms(a)antinode.org>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: schottky diode again..
> From: "Richard Erlacher"
<edick(a)idcomm.com>
>
> If you have a diode of any kind which behaves more as a resistor and less
as
> a diode, i.e. it measures more or less the same in
both directions,
though
differently on
different settings on your DMM, I'd say it's broken.
I'd say you have a modern meter, and neither of you knows how to use
it. The "diode" range on the meter is there because the other
resistance ranges are not useful for testing diodes. Read the manual
for the meter, or buy a curve tracer, or build a continuity tester from
an old flashlight (two-cell preferred), or ...
I'm curious. Have you tried the same family of (mostly misleading)
tests on a known-good, plain-old silicon diode?
> From: jpero(a)cgocable.net
<jpero(a)cgocable.net>
> ...
> says "good" but I know it's very low current also low voltage so that
> would usually not screen out sick diodes.
The current and voltage for the resistance ranges are probably much
lower, which is why the readings are so useless. (Repeat previous rant
here.)
That why I used resistance ranges just to be
sure.
This must be some new meaning of "sure".
There are some subtle defects possible in a diode which will not be
revealed by the "diode" test on a multimeter, but that's almost
certainly the best test offered by the meter.
Wizard
Apparently a misnomer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven M. Schweda (+1) 651-645-9249 (voice, home)
1630 Marshall Avenue #8 (+1) 612-754-2636 (voice, work)
Saint Paul MN 55104-6225 (+1) 612-754-6302 (facsimile, work)
sms(a)antinode.org sms(a)provis.com (work)