23 Apr
2009
23 Apr
'09
4:53 p.m.
On 23 Apr 2009, at 11:26, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
Stumbled across this today and don't recall it having been mentioned
on the list before.
"Welcome to Silicon Genesis, a unique collection of oral history
interviews with pioneers of the semiconductor industry. For access
to streamed versions of the videotaped interviews, see the
complete listing of interviews."
<http://silicongenesis.stanford.edu/complete_listing.html>
Too modern for me, my classic semiconductors are Germanium :-)
Perhaps they allow the relay/valve/germanium generation (which does
NOT include me by the way) to contribute too.
23 Apr
23 Apr
5:54 p.m.
Roger Holmes wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 11:26, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
Michael Riordan (Crystal Fire) may be more appropriate for your interests.
The people mentioned seem appropriate for something called "Silicon Genesis"
though it probably should have said pioneers "in" the semiconductor industry
and not "of". There clearly was a semiconductor industry elsewhere before
Shockley and Fairchild.
People in "Silicon Valley" have an unfortunate habit of discounting technology
that was was created before there was a "Silicon Valley".
http://www.computerhistory.org/semiconductor/
goes back a bit farther.
There is an active group at CHM working on documenting semiconductor history.
Stumbled across this today and don't recall it having been mentioned
on the list before.
"Welcome to Silicon Genesis, a unique collection of oral history
interviews with pioneers of the semiconductor industry. For access
to streamed versions of the videotaped interviews, see the
complete listing of interviews."
<http://silicongenesis.stanford.edu/complete_listing.html>
Too modern for me, my classic semiconductors are Germanium :-)
Perhaps they allow the relay/valve/germanium generation (which does NOT
include me by the way) to contribute too.
24 Apr
24 Apr
2:21 p.m.
People in "Silicon Valley" have an
unfortunate habit of discounting
technology
that was was created before there was a "Silicon Valley".
The same is true for networking people and what was around before ARPAnet.
There is an active group at CHM working on documenting
semiconductor
history.
Is there any liason between this CHM group and the Tube Collector
Association? We in the TCA have been branching out into early
semiconductors for a few years now (but generally not ICs).
--
Will
2:55 p.m.
William Donzelli wrote:
I don't think there is. The group at CHM is the semiconductor special
interest group.
--
If you can find it, take a look at an article that just came out in
the spring 2009 issue of Invention & Technology called "Long Live the
Vacuum Tube!" by Mara Vatz. It has amazing "facts" in it like:
"The basic structure of a vacuum tube is simple: two pieces of metal
separated by nothingness, a vacuum. One piece, the cathode, is heated,
which compels more electrons to leave its confines, or "evaporate", than
would happen at room temperature. The other piece, the anode, is not
heated. The temperature disparity between the two causes electrons
evaporating from the heated anode to travel across the vacuum to the
unheated cathode, but not the other way around."
and..
"Transistors perform essentially the same function, only on a far
smaller scale. But while vacuum tubes have nothing between their two
pieces of metal for an electron to latch onto, transistors are made
of nonconducting ceramic material, which isn't as clean as a vacuum".
This is from a book published by >> MIT PRESS <<
called "Falling for Science: Objects in Mind"
I was hoping this was an April issue, but it appears it is a real article.
People in
"Silicon Valley" have an unfortunate habit of discounting
technology
that was was created before there was a "Silicon Valley".
The same is true for networking people and what was around before ARPAnet.
There is an active group at CHM working on
documenting semiconductor
history.
Is there any liason between this CHM group and the Tube Collector
Association? We in the TCA have been branching out into early
semiconductors for a few years now (but generally not ICs).
9:43 p.m.
I don't think there is. The group at CHM is the
semiconductor special
interest group.
It would not be a bad idea to get the two groups talking. There are
some SERIOUS researchers in the TCA, and quite a treasure trove of
documentation.
This is from a book published by >> MIT PRESS
<<
called "Falling for Science: Objects in Mind"
Eeewww...
So, when they compared tubes and transistors used in computers, did
they find the biggest tube they could get their hands on for the photo
shoot?
--
Will
25 Apr
25 Apr
6:50 a.m.
Al Kossow wrote:
If you can find it, take a look at an article that just came out in
the spring 2009 issue of Invention & Technology called "Long Live the
Vacuum Tube!" by Mara Vatz. It has amazing "facts" in it like:
"The basic structure of a vacuum tube is simple: two pieces of metal
separated by nothingness, a vacuum. One piece, the cathode, is heated,
which compels more electrons to leave its confines, or "evaporate", than
would happen at room temperature. The other piece, the anode, is not
heated. The temperature disparity between the two causes electrons
evaporating from the heated anode to travel across the vacuum to the
unheated cathode, but not the other way around."
and..
"Transistors perform essentially the same function, only on a far
smaller scale. But while vacuum tubes have nothing between their two
pieces of metal for an electron to latch onto, transistors are made
of nonconducting ceramic material, which isn't as clean as a vacuum".
Well, there we have it! - a concise technical explanation of why tube
audio amps sound better then transistor amps.
This is from a book published by >> MIT PRESS
<<
called "Falling for Science: Objects in Mind"
I was hoping this was an April issue, but it appears it is a real article.
5727
days inactive
5729
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
aek＠bitsavers.org -
hilpert＠cs.ubc.ca -
roger.holmes＠microspot.co.uk -
wdonzelli＠gmail.com